User:Filmfanatic88/Notable Figures in the Discovery of the Germ Theory of Disease/AvonnaPollard22 Peer Review

General info
Filmfanatic88
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Filmfanatic88/Key 19th Century Figures in the Discovery and Development of the Germ Theory of Disease:Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):original article

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead Section:

The lead section provides a nice stage for the rest of the article, as it provides an explanation of germ theory, and some background information. I also appreciate the inclusion of a compelling fact at the start of the lead section, this helps to generate more interest.

Content:

The content of your article is well-researched and provides valuable insights in the subject matter. I appreciate the depth of analysis and the inclusion of relevant examples to support your points. However, in some areas, the information could be presented in a more concise manner without sacrificing clarity. Review the text for any repetitive or extraneous details that could be removed.

Tone and Balance:

The tone of the article is generally professional and objective.

Images and Media:

The images provided are well placed, and adds a visual factor that many readers will find helpful.

Sources and References:

I commend you for including a comprehensive list of sources and references. The variety of academic journals and reputable websites strengthen the credibility of your article.

Organization:

The organization of your article is generally logical and coherent. Each section flows smoothly into the next, and subheading help guide the reader through the content.

Overall impressions:

Overall, hats off to your for creating an original article. It shows great potential and is well on its way to becoming a solid piece of work. With some refinements and adjustments, it will become even more engaging and informative.