User:Filmfanatic88/Notable Figures in the Discovery of the Germ Theory of Disease/Jkb0001 Peer Review

General info
Filmfanatic88
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Filmfanatic88/Key 19th Century Figures in the Discovery and Development of the Germ Theory of Disease
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):User:Filmfanatic88/Key 19th Century Figures in the Discovery and Development of the Germ Theory of Disease

Evaluate the drafted changes

 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * The article goes into a lot of detail, which is relevant, but seems as if it could be slimmed down.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * The article is a neutral depiction of past practices and discoveries.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * There is a lot of information on each prominent contributor, but this is relevant as the article is about these people and not just about the discoveries themselves.
 * Check the citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * Some citations such as the "Origin of London Epidemiological Society" reference, seem a bit questionable in their reliability.
 * Is each fact supported by an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * As mentioned above, the "Origin of London Epidemiological Society" may need to be looked at based on its sources not on the article itself.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that should be added?
 * Despite the information presented being on individuals of the 19th century, most of the information is up to date.