User:Findew/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Toshiki Masuda)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(The reason of choosing this article is that it is C-calss, there are a little information and resources. Therefore, I decide to improve it. )

Evaluate the article
(Lead section

This page's lead section is written with basic information, with there are a few sentences. However, there are no statements that explain the main part. In addition, there is no information that does not regard this page, and it is briefly summarized.

Content

This information is related to the page, but people do not update it since last year. This page does not have the history of the award as a lack part, and unrelated information does not exist. This page is about the person who is performing in the present day, so it is not historical representation enough.

Tone and Balance

There are not sentences, information, expression that are on specific position, and underestimation or overestimation do not exist. Besides, this page is biography, so minority's view do not be included.

Sources and References

This page is about the person who is not historical. Therefore, there are no secondary sources such as literature and papers. Editor used latest sources, but some web pages that are provided in References section can not see now.

Organization and writing quality

The text explanation is the only section of life and career, and there are summarized clearly. In addition, mostly the information is attached link, and we can see them in the filmography section.

Images and Media

It lacks a visual point because this page is constructed with almost all tables and a few sentences. Photography is only at the beginning, and the photo has a caption.

Talk page discussion

Editors did not talk each other positively. The quality of sources that are used in this page are C-class, and the importance is low-level.

Overall

This page's status is the beginning, but organization is clearly and I can acquire information easily as a strength. However, it is not edited since last year, and I think it is immature. Therefore, I think that I can add latest information to improve this page.)