User:Finereach/Archived Talk

= Archived talk =

I expect there is a better way of doing this but I don't know how...

Test articles
Hi there. Your user talk page probably isn't the best place for article drafts, as it should mainly be used for communicating with other editors. As an alternative, I'd suggest creating the article in your userspace, in a place such as User:Finereach/Social Cognitive Neuroscience. Just click on that red link and it will automatically create the page for you. justinfr (talk/contribs) 23:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)

Whiteleaf
Hi Finereach, Thanks for your recent suggestions on the re-editing of Whiteleaf which as you intimated has improved it significantly. As you have an interest in Buckinghamshire I thought you might also be interested in participating in the WikiProject UK geography which is working to improve the quaity of such articles relating to places and other things connected to the county. Do go and have a look when you have a moment.

Just a thought again on Whiteleaf. I anticipate that a previous and occasional editor will no doubt shortly seek to reverse these changes as it has removed their references to the ecclesiastical parish. Previously I have reverted these edits. If this editor attempts to undo the tidying up again as before I was hoping you may be able to help and also broaden the debate as it is always best to avoid a 1:1 debate which tends to lead to edit warring etc. From my point of view I will again reiterate two key points that it is clear from the guidelines for settlements that the reference to 'parish' should be for the avoidance of doubt the administrative parish i.e. civil parish being the relevant administrative authority for the village or hamlet. WP guidelines set out in the Manual of Style also stresses the importance of consistency across and within articles retaining the style and conventions already established. Anyway I would be interested in your views. Cheers Tmol42 (talk) 23:22, 17 September 2008 (UTC)