User:Finiantang/sandbox

Feminism in China
 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you?
 * Everything in the article is relevant with Feminism in China. It states the history of feminism in China in detail and the difference between the feminism in China and in the Western countries. What's more, it also introduces some famous feminist in China. The only thing that it's distracted me is that the article spends too many works in describing the history but very few words about present or future.
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position?
 * Actually it is just a introduction to the concept of feminism. There is not any comments that appeared any biased in this article.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented?
 * The difference between the feminism in China and in the Western countries is actually an important point in this article. But the author only use one sentence to state this problem. So I think this viewpoint is quiet underrepresented.
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article?
 * The links all work. The sources about Chinese present situation and Feminism theory strongly support the ideas in the article.
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted?
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added?
 * Every reference is from famous newspaper, such as China Daily, or famous TV channel, like BBC, and so on, which is quiet reliable and not biased.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is no conversations that are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We discussed in our class always represent our own ideas which sometimes appear heavily biased, while the way Wikipedia discusses this topic should be neutral and need to find a lot of reference in order to prove his or her comments.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic?
 * There is no conversations that are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We discussed in our class always represent our own ideas which sometimes appear heavily biased, while the way Wikipedia discusses this topic should be neutral and need to find a lot of reference in order to prove his or her comments.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class?
 * We discussed in our class always represent our own ideas which sometimes appear heavily biased, while the way Wikipedia discusses this topic should be neutral and need to find a lot of reference in order to prove his or her comments.