User:Finny1217/sandbox

Alexandra Adler


 * Is everything in the article relevant to the article topic? Is there anything that distracted you? It is all relevant, but still not that great in amount of content
 * Is the article neutral? Are there any claims, or frames, that appear heavily biased toward a particular position? It is very neutral, but only has very generic information.
 * Are there viewpoints that are overrepresented, or underrepresented? The whole concept in underrepresented
 * Check a few citations. Do the links work? Does the source support the claims in the article? The sources I have tried have worked well
 * Is each fact referenced with an appropriate, reliable reference? Where does the information come from? Are these neutral sources? If biased, is that bias noted? These articles are mostly from Biographies, but all the information right now in the page could be done with it.
 * Is any information out of date? Is anything missing that could be added? One concept on her birth date may be out date, but has already been highly disputed before.
 * Check out the Talk page of the article. What kinds of conversations, if any, are going on behind the scenes about how to represent this topic? There has been not a single comment since 2017
 * How is the article rated? Is it a part of any WikiProjects? It is related in the way that Alexandra was a top woman scientist during her time and made great discoveries in psychology.
 * How does the way Wikipedia discusses this topic differ from the way we've talked about it in class? It is very underwhelming. Not enough to make a lesson out of, rather a footnote.
 * Overall very weak with content. For someone that has done so much research over her life, it seems bizarre that the page is so short and doesn't give you that much.