User:Fintler/March 14th 2011

Please click here to leave me a new message.

LA Fitness -
Hi Fintler,

I'll be adding content to reflect LA Fitness' presence within in the UK and US to help expand this stub, I will welcome corrections if properly refernced, thank you. If you'd like to discuss further please contact me on chris@CENSORED

Kindest Regards

--Canuck chris (talk) 11:05, 3 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the heads up. I just removed your email address from this page so it doesn't get sucked up by some spambot. fintler (talk) 22:05, 6 November 2008 (UTC)

Integrated banner for WikiProject Computer science
I have made a proposal for a integrated banner for the project  here . I invite you for your valuable comments in the discussion. You are receiving this note as you are a member of the project. Thanks --  Tinu  Cherian  - 10:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of "Stephen Gloucester"
A page you created, Stephen Gloucester, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Techman224 Talk  18:55, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Notability of Stephen H. Gloucester
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Stephen H. Gloucester, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Stephen H. Gloucester seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Stephen H. Gloucester, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that '''this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here''' CSDWarnBot (talk) 19:50, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Stephen H. Gloucester
I had no problem with the article, and probably would have deleted the tag myself, but rules are rules. Once it's flagged for speedy, a third party is supposed to take a look at it. And Michig did. No harm no foul.

BTW, why the move from Stephen Gloucester to Stephen H. Gloucester? The original name seems to be the better choice. Rklear (talk) 20:11, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
 * Eh, I have no problem moving it back. I figured having his middle initial in there adds a bit more info. I'm fine with it either way. fintler (talk) 20:14, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Stephen Gloucester Burial Site.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Stephen Gloucester Burial Site.jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 20:57, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Stephen H. Gloucester
I see it now. Remember it's against the rules to untag a page from speedy deletion on pages you created. But now I see he is notable, the article is fine now. Thanks Techman224  Talk  21:29, 23 November 2008 (UTC)

Collyweston stone slate
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Collyweston stone slate, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.ihbc.org.uk/context_archive/58/collyweston/slate.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 06:38, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Stephen Gloucester Burial Site.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Stephen Gloucester Burial Site.jpg. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check


 * That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
 * That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 06:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

nist-hash mailing list?
Can I read the nist-hash mailing list online anywhere? Where do I sign up? Cheers! ciphergoth (talk) 20:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of HigherEdCamp
I have nominated HigherEdCamp, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/HigherEdCamp. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. - 2 ... says you, says me 04:10, 7 June 2009 (UTC)

White collar
The edit I made to this page wasn't vandalism. I just thought a potentially popular TV series would be more viewed than the article previously redirected to. Sorry. Kevinbrogers (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Fintler! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 00:47, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Elaine Weyuker -

Proposed deletion of Gesture Table


The article Gesture Table has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rklawton (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I agree with the merge/delete. fintler (talk) 18:22, 30 March 2010 (UTC)