User:Fionaligor/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating? Aorta
Talk:Aorta Aorta

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I choose it because I'm currently in anatomy class right now so I choose the anatomy talk pages. I choose the aorta because I know what it is and what it does. Also when I opened the article it actually had some information compared to some others I opened.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The article was spilt up in to many categories and each part did not have much information and had many links to other articles. They did not seem confident in the information they were portraying to us and even used their opinion at one point. There are many sources in the article and most look pretty credible but they did cite some unreliable sources and articles that don't directly relate to the aorta. Especially sources like Medline plus or a random article. The most credible sources are the text books and scientific journals. There is not much talking going on in the talk page, as the collaborators seem to have contradicting opinions. It is also all over the place and makes no sense on what they are talking about. A lot of big words are used and some of the wording used to describe the aorta makes no sense. Such as hairpin turn and even linking what it is. But the used of anatomical terminology makes it easy for someone who knows the terms to understand but not for someone who doesn't.