User:Firozean/sandbox

Consensuses of Collapse: Textual theory in the works of Fellini
Text randomly generated from the Postmodernism Generator located here

1. Fellini and submodern cultural theory
The main theme of the works of Fellini is not discourse per se, but postdiscourse. Therefore, many materialisms concerning dialectic Marxism may be discovered. Textual theory suggests that the raison d’etre of the artist is social comment.

If one examines dialectic Marxism, one is faced with a choice: either accept the subcapitalist paradigm of discourse or conclude that narrative comes from the masses, given that the premise of dialectic Marxism is invalid. But Dahmus states that we have to choose between the postdialectic paradigm of reality and capitalist neotextual theory. Sartre uses the term ‘submodern cultural theory’ to denote the role of the participant as observer.

The primary theme of Hamburger’s analysis of textual theory is the rubicon, and eventually the genre, of cultural society. Therefore, Foucault’s critique of dialectic Marxism holds that the task of the participant is significant form. If postdialectic situationism holds, we have to choose between submodern cultural theory and capitalist theory.

“Truth is dead,” says Marx. Thus, Lyotard uses the term ‘textual theory’ to denote not, in fact, discourse, but neodiscourse. Brophy implies that we have to choose between submodern cultural theory and the predialectic paradigm of narrative.

The main theme of the works of Spelling is the stasis, and some would say the fatal flaw, of capitalist society. But Marx promotes the use of textual theory to deconstruct archaic perceptions of sexual identity. Sartre uses the term ‘dialectic Marxism’ to denote not narrative, as subcultural textual theory suggests, but prenarrative.

Thus, several materialisms concerning the role of the artist as writer exist. In Beverly Hills 90210, Spelling reiterates textual theory; in Melrose Place, although, he deconstructs submodern cultural theory.

But Debord suggests the use of textual theory to read society. If the submaterial paradigm of expression holds, we have to choose between textual theory and semanticist discourse.

However, Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic Marxism’ to denote a postcapitalist whole. The primary theme of Wilson’s model of textual theory is the failure, and thus the dialectic, of dialectic society.

It could be said that Lyotard promotes the use of neostructural libertarianism to attack hierarchy. Many sublimations concerning submodern cultural theory may be revealed.

Thus, the subject is interpolated into a cultural narrative that includes art as a reality. Foucault uses the term ‘textual theory’ to denote the role of the reader as writer.

In a sense, von Ludwig holds that the works of Spelling are modernistic. Sartre uses the term ‘submodern cultural theory’ to denote not appropriation, but postappropriation.

2. Predialectic modernist theory and Derridaist reading
In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of subcultural narrativity. It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a textual theory that includes art as a totality. The characteristic theme of the works of Joyce is the stasis, and subsequent futility, of capitalist language.

If one examines postcultural theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject dialectic Marxism or conclude that art serves to reinforce the status quo, but only if culture is equal to truth; if that is not the case, Bataille’s model of textual theory is one of “semiotic objectivism”, and hence fundamentally unattainable. Therefore, if dialectic Marxism holds, we have to choose between neodialectic discourse and textual Marxism. Dialectic Marxism implies that the media is meaningless.

However, Baudrillard suggests the use of Foucaultist power relations to challenge and modify class. The subject is interpolated into a textual theory that includes narrativity as a whole.

It could be said that Baudrillard uses the term ‘dialectic Marxism’ to denote not narrative as such, but postnarrative. The stasis, and eventually the meaninglessness, of Derridaist reading which is a central theme of Joyce’s Finnegan’s Wake is also evident in Dubliners.

But Foucault’s critique of neostructuralist discourse suggests that the raison d’etre of the reader is social comment. The subject is contextualised into a Derridaist reading that includes language as a reality.

3. Realities of defining characteristic
In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the distinction between destruction and creation. In a sense, the premise of dialectic Marxism states that art may be used to disempower the Other. The primary theme of Reicher’s model of textual theory is the collapse, and therefore the paradigm, of subcapitalist sexual identity.

“Society is intrinsically responsible for hierarchy,” says Lyotard. Thus, textual desublimation suggests that the significance of the participant is significant form, given that Marx’s critique of textual theory is valid. A number of discourses concerning not, in fact, materialism, but neomaterialism exist.

But the subject is interpolated into a dialectic Marxism that includes consciousness as a totality. Sontag uses the term ‘Debordist image’ to denote the stasis, and some would say the economy, of prepatriarchialist sexual identity.

In a sense, the subject is contextualised into a textual theory that includes narrativity as a whole. In A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man, Joyce reiterates dialectic Marxism; in Finnegan’s Wake he analyses Derridaist reading.

Therefore, Lyotard uses the term ‘textual theory’ to denote the bridge between society and sexuality. D’Erlette implies that the works of Joyce are postmodern.