User:FisherQueen/Archive56

 {| style="text-align:center; border: 1px solid #000000; background-color:#3CB371; width: 100%" ! style="font-family: Trebuchet MS, sans-serif; color: #000000; font-size: large; line-height: 1.3em;" colspan="2"|FisherQueen
 * - padding:1em;padding-top:0.5em;"

 User Page · Talk page · Archives · Sandbox · Patrol · Templates 
 * style="text-align:left; padding: 8px; background-color:#DCDCDC"|
 * style="text-align:left; padding: 8px; background-color:#DCDCDC"|

Green Archers United F.C.
The plot thickens-- Articles for deletion/2011 LBC United Football League.

The nominator was (dramatic pause} User:Banana Fingers. Who after the AFD, did this.

I plan to drop him/her a line. See my eloquent rant after your own comments on the talk. I'll have to mention this to Jasper Deng.

I came within a hair's breadth of honoring the CSD. Dloh cierekim  14:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC) Dloh cierekim  14:30, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The sad truth is that I don't know enough about football in the Philippines to even make a list of the things I don't know. I'm so ignorant, I call it 'soccer.'  I'm keeping well out of this one.  Whatever is going on, I am sure it makes sense to someone.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:06, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I don't know anything about soccer either. All good now. Dloh  cierekim  21:17, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

Contest deletion of page
I am new to Wikipedia and have so far created only one article. I received notification today that it had been nominated for speedy deletion, only to find that it had in fact been deleted yesterday. Your reason for deletion was cited as A7.

After reading your user page, it says that if I feel it was deleted in error I should send you links of articles to this person to validate their notability.

The page in question is Graham Hetrick. Below are several links to articles and such regarding Mr. Hetrick.

Mode Weekly Article

Highmark Living Legacy Series

Harrisburg University Info

Penn Live (This is a list containing 36 articles mentioning Mr. Hetrick)

Thank you for your consideration.

--NancyCates (talk) 15:16, 6 June 2011 (UTC)Nancy Cates
 * Thanks! I've looked at those articles, and I'm afraid that I'm not convinced that this person meets the notability criteria at WP:PROF, so I'm reluctant to recreate the article based on them.   Of course, I could be wrong.  I've been wrong before.  If, after reading the guidelines, you still think that this is a notable person by Wikipedia's standards, you can get a discussion going that would get other people's point of view by requesting undeletion at Deletion Review.  Let me know what you think after you've had a close look at WP:PROF- I'm open to the possibility that I'm missing something. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:03, 6 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 6 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:36, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

Hey
I was looking at the article on Mike Pence. The article reads like a campaign piece, and a number of edits have been done by HouseofRep. user who attempts to being the Congressional office of Mike Pence. They got in trouble for copying stuff straight from there Government website, then said they were his office and released the rights. I don't think any congressional members page should be one sided, negative or positive. I know it has a neutrality tag but what else can be done short of taking a chainsaw to it. Here is the talkpage http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:HouseofRep. where they admit they are his office and here is there list of contributions only to Pence and postive edits http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/HouseofRep. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.250.146.100 (talk) 23:02, 10 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Go ahead and do a neutral rewrite, if you're willing to. If the anon writer tries to prevent you, put a note at WP:ANI asking for a few more eyes on the article. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 12:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Rollback
Please note that rollback should only be used to revert obvious vandalism. As explained at WP:RBK, "Use of standard rollback for any other purposes – such as reverting good-faith changes which you happen to disagree with – is likely to be considered misuse of the tool. When in doubt, use another method of reversion and supply an edit summary to explain your reasoning." I'm not sure why you considered this edit vandalism, so be more careful in future OK? Polequant (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I reverted your edits and immediately commented on your talk page, since my comment would not fit easily into an edit summary. My comment was polite and reasonable, and met with astonishing rudeness.  I decided that I did not want to talk with you any more, told you so, and removed both the article and your talk page from my watch list.  I assume that your next step, after that, was to go looking for a reason that I am bad and wrong, since that would justify your random rudeness to me.  That's fine, but I don't really want to hear from you any more, as I said.  I hope you'll remove my talk page from your watchlist and go back to whatever you were doing, without me. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 21:11, 13 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Why not ask first then edit? Using rollback indicates you think my edit was disruptive, which might be considered rude dontcha think? I was confused by your question on my page because you seem to misunderstand the purpose of tags. I cannot see any "astonishing rudeness" in my responses and am bemused by such a characterization, which is more of a personal attack than anything I have said to you.Polequant (talk) 21:47, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:45, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Socks of User:S.S. Miami
I think User:Mamma_Rose is another sock that appeared yesterday - all but one of the pages edited so far have also been edited by either User:Bialytock&Bloom and/or User:StryoFome; very first edit shows he/she knows how to revert edits.86.138.46.178 (talk) 14:28, 14 June 2011 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.138.46.178 (talk)
 * Might be, but this user isn't uploading images, which was one of that disruptive person's favorite things to be annoying about, so I'm not sure. I am not a checkuser, so I don't have the ability to double-check the technical data and be more certain, but you could request an investigation at Sockpuppet investigations, and a checkuser could have a look and see if this is likely to be the same person.  -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:03, 14 June 2011 (UTC)

Mike Pence Page Q
Hey FisherQueen, A couple weeks ago I commented to you on an article on Mike Pence showing you how it had been openly edited by his House of Reps. office to make him both look good and hide his quotes and policies that wouldn't make him look good. I went ahead and finally got around to cleaning up the article. I removed the uncited materials and added some sections. I am sure however his office has this page on a watch list. Is there someway to tag it to make it so they can't revert the edits. I tried best to keep article neutral and show ALL his policies, not just his ones that would be appealing to a large audience. He has announced he running for Gov. of Indiana recently and I feel like this pages traffic will increase quite a bit in the next year and would like it to remain neutral for the election. I also find it kind of disgusting almost that his office is openly influencing wikipedia and his page. Just wanted to bring it your attention and keep up the great work! You are a great admin. and I respect your opinion. Whatever you choose to do I am sure will be the right call.

All the best,

--Andy0093 (talk) 22:13, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 15:13, 21 June 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:52, 28 June 2011 (UTC)