User:FitzMacDeO

Dear WIKIPEDIA & Co., Mesdames et Monsieurs, Alles Damen und Herren, U.N., Present and accounted-for, this user has logged-in, metaversally, in ones own connotative definition of the parent term.(q.v.) For that is METAVERSE, the related cause for the intitiative of this response. In parallel, then, let us explore the relationship of "virtual" to "realistic" and "reality-based", and the very sensibility of allowing for an abstract reasoning of more Fact-based utility of the union: the prefix meta- as it is combined with the suffix, -verse. The possession of origin relates factually to the term, itself, as a necessary definition of a certain type of relationship where "Question" is (infinitely) a priori and Answer is (eternally, a propos) a poseriori. The term is discoverable- as one discovered- by the necssity of it- the invention of which occurs as a necessary junction of values requiring complimentation and augmentation for the purpose of enhancing their creative potential and the inherent value in the process of creativity. Only its origin is copyright, for the initiative belongs to G-D Let the term, then, relate not so phantasmogorically- in ones opinion, albeit more elementally, less cosmic-ly than Principly, that is, more according to the generic principle and the phenomenon of its potential "absolute" virtue as a compliment to operational, scholastic life...in contrast to the "virtual" realm of entertainment-value. The term requires the consideration of Collegium and (Oxford) Dictionary conventions for legitimation. Thank you. -D.O.