User:Fjeinca

User Fjeinca is a writer, musician, and inventor with diverse intellectual interests and pursuits. Every single contribution/revision this user provides is offered without ANY emotional attachment. Knowledge is not something that any one person/editor can or should own. Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and if anyone is so territorial as to feel a need to "revert" (destroy) my editing, I only ask that they refrain from a) assigning some sort of negative motive(s) to my work, and b) attempting to start an argument by insinuating that they are more important than me, based upon their own inflated egoism.

If I edited your English, it probably was rather poor, so please do me and the community here a big favor and try to consider that any corrections were made from a place of trying to support the maximum effectiveness of content here for general audiences. If you are a snooty self-important pseudo-expert on some subject you hold dear, why not get yourself hired as a college/university professor teaching the subject? People who go around accusing sincere efforts (I am a professional educator with decades of experience, BTW) to help general non-expert readers grasp wiki page content as "vandalism" are likely both obsessive and delusional. Or so closely akin to bullies that no distinction exists.

I have zero interest in undoing anyone else's readable English, so if you are the type of person who goes around reverting others' sincere efforts to contribute, I pity you and feel your pain. I suggest you get a clue and try to focus on constructive rather than destructive tasks.

I don't define myself on Wikipedia and no one else does either. My self esteem is not dependent upon what you think of me. I do what I do here as a public service. If you are still determined to repeatedly undo my sincere work here, it only identifies you as who and what you are, and odds are I will outlast you even if you try to puff your chest out and feign greater authority.

Those edits I make without explanation are usually 100% consistent with similar edits on the same article and I am not eager to restate the obvious ad nauseum.