User:Flagg2020/Evaluate an Article

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Norris Church Mailer: Norris Church Mailer
 * This is a school assignment.

Lead
First off, the lead is clear and informative and gives the reader an overview of the person. Unfortunately though, I was unable to find a description of the article's major sections. Everything in the lead includes information that is present in the article and even provides a link within each sentence. Overall the lead gives us a overview without being overly detailed.

Content
The article is organized in a way that is easy to read. Each topic is chronological and relevant to the topic. All of the information in the article is up-to-date. Upon reviewing this information, there weren't any of it that was irrelevant or off topic. Overall concise and organized.

Tone and Balance
Every element of the article is neutral and never sways in opinion or bias. There are some elements of this article that are underrepresented. Her career as a model and writer should be explained more. Overall, the article does a great job in presenting her life objectively and never tries to persuade.

Sources and References
The sources and references are current and all lead to a reliable sources. They are all good sources that thoroughly support the information in the article. All of the links work and didn't present any technical issues.

Organization
The article was an easy read. It was to the point while highlighting important information on her life. Although, I would have liked to see a little more information. However, there weren't any grammatical errors and was well organized which helped the ability to read.

Images and Media
I would have liked to see a little more images in this article. Th topic was on a model who took a lot of pictures. To incorporate that in the article could help. However there is one good image that is well captioned.

Checking the talk page
There is quite a few comments in the talk section. Most of which are commenting on a few grammar issues and the citations used.

Overall impressions
Overall the article is a good read. I left wanting more information on the woman. The information given was a bit minimal. However, the sources were good and lead to thorough sources. The strengths of this article is in it's organization. Everything is laid out clean and chronological which makes the reader read it easily. Overall, the article can be developed a little more. More information and images could improve this article.