User:Flagg2020/sandbox

Evaluate an article
This is where you will complete your article evaluation. Please use the template below to evaluate your selected article.


 * Cybernetics: Cybernetics
 * This is a school assignment.

Lead
The lead is concise and to the point. There are links to several words which are helpful in getting background information.The information given is very thorough and informative. Overall good work.

Content
There should be more emphasis on the different elements of cybernetics rather than the history and future. However, it is well written with no apparent grammatical errors.

Tone and Balance
Every element of the article is neutral and never sways in opinion or bias. However, some parts of the article could have been flushed out a bit more. Some sections were just too general, especially on subjects that include the scientific element, which are important to cybernetics. Overall, the article is a bit too general and could use more explanation on various elements of cybernetics.

Sources and References
The sources and references are current and all lead to a reliable sources. They are all good sources that thoroughly support the information in the article. All of the links work and didn't present any technical issues.

Organization
The organization was a bit confusing. Although there was a lot of information, it all felt a little jumbled together. It was not neatly organized in a way that made it easier to read.

Images and Media
The images provided were very small and were placed on irrelevant sections of the article. If they were a bit bigger it would make the article more appealing.

Checking the talk page
There is quite a few comments in the talk section. Most of which are commenting on how general the article is. There is also quite a few people commenting on the quality of the photos in the article.

Overall impressions
Overall the article is an informative read. What stood out was the lack of organization of the sections. Everything just felt al over the place aesthetically. I also left wanting more information on some of the subjects within the topic. The information given was a bit general. However, there were plenty of sources that led to quality background information. Overall, the strengths of this article are in its links and citing. The downsides are in the organization and photos provided.