User:Flamebroil/Archive/Archive-Jul2007

Welcome!
Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date.
 * Introduction
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

yourmessagehere

If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! &mdash; Arnon Chaffin Got a message? 20:19, 29 May 2007 (UTC)

pre-state description of Goguryeo
I think I've found the source for the following statement: The Samguk Sagi, a 12th century AD Goryeo text, indicate that Goguryeo was founded in 37 BCE by Jumong, a prince from Buyeo, although there is archaeological evidence that suggests Goguryeo culture was in existence since the 2nd century BCE around the fall of Gojoseon. I vaguely remember that claim similar to that, probably in another section of the article, quoted Encyclopedia Britannica. Here's the relevant text: ''the largest of the three kingdoms into which ancient Korea was divided until 668. Koguryo is traditionally said to have been founded in 37 BC in the Tongge River basin of northern Korea by Chu-mong, leader of one of the Puyo tribes native to the area, but modern historians believe it is more likely that the tribal state was formed in the 2nd century BC.'' I think this claim is supported by archaeological evidence. Archaeological remains that suggest limited social stratification have been found in the incipient Goguryeo region, such as Liaoning bronze dagger culture, which is often seen as archaeological features that characterize Gojoseon, and dolmens, which is also associated with Gojoseon and the proto-Korean cultural sphere. Cydevil38 01:14, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi, please see your talk page for a response. Mumun 無文 15:35, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Your proposal seems pretty damn fine. As for the next sentence, what kind of examples do you have in mind? Cydevil38 23:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Goguryeo
혹시, 제가 해 놓은 편집이 이상했습니까? 딱 보기에 문서 앞부분에 중국인들의 입장만 서술해 놓으면 제3자의 입장에서 고구려가 중국사로 보일 수 있기 때문에 글을 고친건데 이상했나요? 답장 주세요. --Korea history 18:44, 10 June 2007 (UTC)


 * 안녕하세요. 무문님...

이유는 잘 알았습니다. 아마 님께서도 중국학자들의 의견이 문서 앞에 있다는 것은 좀 아니라고 판단한, 제 의견과 이견이 없으시다고 사려됩니다. 그리고 제가 영어 실력이 모자라서 직접적으로는 나서지 못합니다. 이해해 주십시오. 아무튼 우리역사를 위해 한번 잘 해봅시다. 그럼... --Korea history 14:05, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Review Requested
Could you please help to create the first newsletter for WP SASK ? ... a pilot perhaps could start similar to....WP SASK Newsletter Do you have any other ideas ... it seems like other WP projects have tried to use newsletters, would it be helpful for WP SASK to also have one?.... SriMesh | talk  23:17, 14 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Do you wish to receive a newsletter like this?

SriMesh | talk  05:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Regina neighbourhoods
Not sure if I adequately addressed your queries here; if not by all means ask further and I'll see if I can make the discussion a little less opaque. It becomes mildly tricky discussing matters of demographics without becoming politically incorrect and even potentially offensive. Given that the whole article was originally conceived as a sop to the concerns of the now apparently departed Mayor Quimby as to discussion of the North Central area of Regina, it may all be somewhat moot. Masalai 11:01, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate Image:Mumunsitemap.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Mumunsitemap.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Mumunsitemap.jpg is a duplicate of an already existing article, category or image. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Mumunsitemap.jpg, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Mumunsitemap.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:27, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Mumunsitemap.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Mumunsitemap.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 14:07, 18 June 2007 (UTC)

Postdoc student
Actually, you're dead wrong about this; I was a postdoc student for several years; I notice you used British English, perhaps you're not familiar with the system used in American universities (and their affiliated organizations, such as the Korean Institute, located near Harvard in the US). In the US, post-doc refers to the period where you are still building credentials as a student before you have reached professorship. It's not a big deal, just your comment seemed quite misinformed so I figured I'd drop you a note. If you have any doubt, search google for this phrase and you'll see tens of thousands of references. — LactoseTI T 16:41, 25 June 2007 (UTC)

re Daegu
All citations that are directly referenced by the text should be in an inline citation section, entitled references. Books and other sources not cited by the text should be contained in a further reading section. Dr. Cash 19:05, 28 June 2007 (UTC)


 * I wasn't being rude. I was just correcting you. Dr. Cash 19:58, 28 June 2007 (UTC)