User:Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza/Nataliabetzler Peer Review

General info
Flamingo511, Ok4ytqum, Beefpatty06, Cloudynoir
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead:

The wikipedia page has a strong lead. It briefly describes who Juana Belen Gutiérrez de Mendoza was, as well as prominent events of her career. The lead does not include information that is not present in the article. While brief, I believe that this is a strong characteristic of the lead because all of the information listed is later explained in greater detail on the page. The lead is concise.

Content:

The content added is all relevant to the topic and it is up to date. No content appears to be missing or not belong on the wikipedia page. This article deals with one of Wikipedia’s equity gaps and is related to historically underrepresented populations and topics. It deals with how Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza was inspired to begin her career in activism because of the hardships of miners in Mexico, which is an underrepresented topic. She was also outspoken about the indigenous populations of Mexico, a topic of which there is not a lot of existing content.

Tone and Balance

The content is neutral. No claims appear to be heavily biased towards any particular position. The article is overall very informative, unbiased, and educational. There are no viewpoints that are over or under represented in my opinion as well.

Sources and References

The article does a very good job with hyperlinks and footnotes to the different sources it usees. While it has a very good reference list at the bottom of the article, it does a great job of including many hyperlinks embedded throughout the article. It is clear that the writers of this article put much time, effort, and thought into ensuring that the information written was supported by reliable sources. The sources are through and reflect the available information and literature on the topic. The sources are primarily from books or journals, rather than random articles and websites that could be found online. They are current, ranging from 2005 to 2023. The links work as well.

Organization

The organization of this article is great. In biographical wikipedia pages, I feel that it is best to go through the person’s life as a timeline, and that’s exactly what this article did. I also thought it was great to separate her “Early Life” and “Early Activism” into two categories. The content does not appear to have any grammatical or spelling errors.

Images and Media

The article does not include images, however I do not believe that this hinders the clarity and thoroughness of the article.

Overall impressions

The article expands on an existing article about Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza that only included a brief paragraph about the activist. The content of the new article drastically improves the overall quality of the information given about the activist. The strength of the content is that it actually delves into the prominent moments of the activist’s life, rather than summing everything up into one article. While the original wikipedia page states, “She is one of the many intellectuals who contributed with her writings to the Mexican Revolution,” the new article writes extensively about her journalistic career and its impact. The content could be improved by potentially including information about her life post-activism, however I am not sure if that is absolutely necessary. Overall, I think this article is great.