User:Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza/Sprinkles303 Peer Review

General info
(Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza

Evaluate the drafted changes
I do not see a specific lead section. Only a biography. The biography does a good job on introducing Juana but does not describe all topics that are talked about in the rest of the article and needs more detail. The content of this article is up to date and is very relevant to the topic as it explains her early life, activism, and her wiring contributions. All the content belongs in the article and is very detailed and explanatory. The tone is very neutral as the author explains that while she made great continuations in activism, her position as a teacher was not positive. The author shows all perspectives and viewpoints of Juana thus keeping it neutral and not persuading the reader in one direction or the other as all the different points are presented. All the content is backed up by reliable secondary sources. All the links in the references work and are relevant to the topics of the article. Each paragraph has at least one source to back up the writings and multiple sources are utilized throughout the article so that it is kept neutral and avoids biases. The content is clearly written as well as in a good order. Although the article is missing a lead, the rest of the articles organization flows with a nice chronological order as it starts of with a biography, her early life, early activism, and then her activism post-revolution and ends off with her contributions in writings making the article come together to explain who Juana is and her significance through the different broken down sections. No images were added to the article. The article is supported by more than 2-3 secondary sources and thus meets the notability requirements. The article also follows the correct structure with the different subheads and headings, however there is no lead section. My overall impression of the article was that it was organized with a good amount of relevant content. I liked that all perspectives and viewpoints were described through multiple relevant secondary sources to reduce biasses and explain all aspects of Juana and how she was viewed. The content can be improved by adding a lead section that will introduced the topics that will be talked about in the article, but otherwise good job!