User:Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza/Sushilover12 Peer Review

General info
Flamingo511
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Flamingo511/Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Juana Belén Gutiérrez de Mendoza

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: There is a good biography as it is concise and organized. There is a lot of important information on the person they are doing there project on. There is a strong introductory sentence as it gives some information on who there person is.

Content: It looks that the information is current and pertinent to the lead part. It is comprehensive and includes details on her personal life, career, and advocacy, among other things. It explains how she was an activist, feminist, academic, and journalist from Mexico. She collaborated to leftist newspapers and authored works of radical feminist fiction. She was very vocal in her condemnation of the Porfiriato and the Catholic church.

Tone and Balance: The tone of the article does appear to be neutral.

Sources and References: There are no references, but there are some sources.

Organization: It is well organized and very detailed. The information is easy to comprehend, succinct, and clear. I read the entire post with no prior understanding of this topic.

Images: None

Overall: Overall, I think this is a great wikipedia page and is very detailed and organized. Some pictures should be added. The length of this wikipedia page is good and the content is very clear.