User:Flanagan Institute Applicant/Digital hoarding/Hf1842 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Flanagan Institute Applicant


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Digital hoarding


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead
The lead is well written, although this user has not added their contributions yet.

Content
The mission section is written well. However, more sources need to be added to back up the claims in the section. The resources section is written well and needs no changes as of right now. The Advocacy also is up to date and needs no changes. All of the content currently in the article gives good and relevant information about the topic at hand.

Tone and Balance
The content is basically from a neutral standpoint and represents the topic well. However, you might want to find views from a source other than the DPC to balance out your content.

Sources and References
The DPC is well represented in sources. However, as mentioned, finding sources from places other than the DPC might be helpful in balancing out your article.

Organization
The article is very well-written at this point. I do not see any major organizational or grammatical/spelling flaws.

Images and Media
There are no images or media in the article as of yet.

Overall Impressions
The draft of this article looks very good. Once the user finds some sources from more balanced viewpoints, I believe that the article will be very well done.