User:Floridaman2020/sandbox

Florida Amendment 4, also the Voter Approval of Constitutional Amendments, is an amendment to the Constitution of Florida on the ballot in 2020. Florida Amendment 4 would require that all proposed future amendments or revisions to the state constitution be approved by voters in two elections instead of one in order to take effect.

What do people say?

Florida Amendment 4 would effectively end grassroots ballot initiatives in Florida. A diverse coalition of organizations have united against the amendment. Sun Sentinel, Orlando Sentinel, Tampa Bay Times, and Gainesville Sun all recommend against this proposal.

“Ballot initiative #4 would…make it twice as hard and twice as expensive for Floridians’ voices to be heard…This ballot initiative disregards the will of the people and renders their voices mute on the very issue they care about most.”[1]–ACLU

Key Notes:

●      Florida Amendment 4 changes the amendment process in Florida by requiring new amendments or revisions to current constitutional amendments to go through the ballot initiative process twice, increasing the time it takes to make constitutional changes.

●      Florida Amendment 4 has both opponents and sponsors:

○      Florida Amendment 4 is sponsored by the Keep Our Constitution Clean PAC, which is funded by lobbying organizations and Florida Power & Light.

○      Florida Amendment 4 is opposed by ACLU Florida and the League of Women Voters of Florida.

●      The 2020 Florida Amendment 4 is NOT the same as the 2018 Florida Amendment 4.

Florida Amendment 4: Voter Approval of Constitutional Amendments

·      A “yes” means Florida voters will need to vote twice to approve constitutional amendments. Citizen initiatives for amendments will be more costly and time consuming. Enactment of voter approved changes will be delayed and opponents would have a second chance to defeat a popular amendment.

·      A “no” means voters will maintain the current amendment process and will only need to vote once to approve new amendments.

FOR Florida ballot Amendment 4: Keep Our Constitution Clean PC

AGAINST Florida ballot Amendment 4: AFL-CIO, ACLU, Common Cause, Florida Civic Engagement Table [1] “What Is Florida’s Amendment 4, The Voter Approval of Constitutional Amendments?” WUSF Public Media, 9/16/20.

Background
Florida Amendment 4 is on the Florida ballot because Keep Our Constitution Clean, a PAC run by Jason H. Haber, a Fort Lauderdale attorney and chairman of the Republicans Against Green Energy PAC, spent close to $9 million to gather the signatures needed to qualify for the ballot.[1]

Impact
How Florida Amendment 4 Would Change the Florida Amendment Process

The new Florida Amendment 4 (which is separate from the 2018 Amendment 4 working its way through the courts to restore felon voting rights), is a proposed amendment that would require all future constitutional amendments to be approved in elections twice. The likely outcome of this change would be fewer amendments proposed and fewer amendments approved.6

Florida’s current standard of a 60% approval for amendments is much higher than the threshold needed in most states. If Florida Amendment 4 passes, Florida would be joining Nevada as the only other state with this requirement. 7 The president of The League of Women Voters of Florida claims, “To have two separate elections to get one amendment passed makes no sense whatsoever, and is just going to completely nail shut the coffin on the citizen initiative process.”8

Since 1962, Nevada has had an incredibly low number of constitutional amendments, with only 14 citizen-initiated amendments passed at the first election, and 12 of those passing at the second round. The Florida amendment process would likely follow in Nevada’s footsteps with these much lower numbers, should Florida Amendment 4 become law.9

The main campaign in support of Florida Amendment 4 is led by Keep Our Constitution Clean PC, a PAC run by Jason H. Haber. The PAC states the amendment is necessary to “reduce whimsical constitutional amendments.” They cite the great difference in number of amendments between the Florida constitution, with 140 amendments since the 1960s, and the US constitution, with 27 since the 1700s.10 The PAC is backed by a non-profit with essentially the same name, Keep Our Constitution Clean Inc. The non-profit has raised almost $9 million for the campaign, but they have not disclosed who the money is coming from. This lack of information means voters do not know who is funding the campaign and what their motives are.

The main campaign against Florida Amendment 4 includes: AFL-CIO, ACLU of Florida, LWVFL, BAWN: Ban Assault Weapons Now, SPLC Action Fund, and Florida Rights Restoration Coalition.11

For those still wondering if the Florida constitution is currently too easy to amend, it must be noted that it takes a multi-million-dollar effort to get enough signatures for an amendment to even make it on the ballot. Out of the six amendments in 2020, two have sponsors that have spent millions to get them on the ballot. Aubrey Jewett, author of the Politics in Florida textbook, says he supported the increase from 50% to 60% voter approval in 2006, but he worries Florida Amendment 4 is taking it too far. He says he is “a little concerned that maybe we’re…making it a little too difficult for people to exercise direct democracy”, which is “part of the checks and balances in the Florida system.”12

The Florida constitutional amendment process is one way that Floridians can get their voices heard, and ensure the constitution reflects their values and beliefs. Past citizen-led initiatives include ending smoking in workplaces, curbing property taxes, and putting an end to inhumane animal farms. 13 Florida Amendment 4 would require amendments to go through the current constitutional amendment process twice in order to get onto the Florida ballot, potentially increasing the time it takes for voter approved changes to be made to the constitution.14

As it appeared on the Florida ballot on November 6, 2018, the text of the amendment read: ""

provided by the Florida Division of Elections. A 60 percent vote in favor was required for approval.

Implementation
·  A “yes” on the ballot supports requiring all proposed future amendments or revisions to the state constitution to be approved by voters in two elections, instead of one, in order to take effect.

·  A “no” on the ballot would keep the requirement that opposes requiring all proposed future amendments or revisions to the state constitution to be approved by voters in two  one election s, instead of one  two , in order to take effect.

Florida Amendment 4, the Require Constitutional Amendments to be Passed Twice Initiative, is on the ballot in Florida as an initiated constitutional amendment on November 3, 2020.&#91;1&#93;

A 60% supermajority vote is required for the approval of Amendment 4. Overview What would Amendment 4 change about constitutional amendments in Florida? <dl><dd>See also: <a href="#Constitutional_changes">Constitutional changes</a></dd></dl></dd></dl> Amendment 4 would require constitutional amendments to be approved by voters at two successive general elections to become effective. Currently in Florida, if voters approve an amendment at one general election, it becomes part of the constitution. In Florida, constitutional amendments require a <a href="/Supermajority_requirement" title="Supermajority requirement">60% supermajority vote</a> to become effective. This requirement was added to the constitution in 2006. Under Amendment 4, the supermajority requirement would apply to both elections.<sup id="cite_ref-Text_1-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-Text-1">&#91;1&#93;</a>

<a href="/File:Florida_Amendment_4_(2020)_process_chart_(150_resolution).png" class="image"><img alt="Florida Amendment 4 (2020) process chart (150 resolution).png" src="https://cdn.ballotpedia.org/images/1/1e/Florida_Amendment_4_%282020%29_process_chart_%28150_resolution%29.png" width="1509" height="638" data-file-width="1509" data-file-height="638" /></a> <span class="mw-headline" id="Who_is_behind_the_campaigns_surrounding_Amendment_4.3F">Who is behind the campaigns surrounding Amendment 4? <a href="#" class="customToolTip" customToolTipSource="#CustomToolTip1">How current is this information?</a>  '''The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most <a href="#" class="customToolTip" customToolTipSource="#CustomToolTip2">recently scheduled reports processed by Ballotpedia</a> Campaign finance report filing deadlines vary by state. Scheduled deadlines are usually based on periodic requirements—such as monthly or quarterly reports—or certain lengths of time before and after elections. Some states require interim reports in response to contributions of a certain size in addition to scheduled reports. It is not uncommon for reports to be filed late for a given campaign finance deadline. , which covered through September 25, 2020.&#160;The <a href="#" class="customToolTip" customToolTipSource="#CustomToolTip3">deadline</a> Campaign finance report deadlines are set by law. It is not uncommon for reports to be filed after the deadlines. Ballotpedia updates the reports as soon as possible after the campaign finance filing deadline. for the next scheduled reports was October 9, 2020.''' <dl><dd>See also: <a href="#Support">Support</a>, <a href="#Opposition">Opposition</a>, and <a href="#Campaign_finance">Campaign finance</a></dd></dl> <a href="#Support">Keep Our Constitution Clean PC</a> is leading the campaign in support of Amendment 4. The committee raised $9.01 million, all of which was given by the <a href="/Non-profit_organization" class="mw-redirect" title="Non-profit organization"> non-profit</a> group Keep Our Constitution Clean, Inc. Jason Zimmerman, a lawyer for Keep Our Constitution Clean PC said, "By doing pass-it-twice, we think we can reduce the amount of ... whimsical constitutional amendments. [In Florida], there have been more than 140 constitutional amendments [since the 1960s]. The United States Constitution, which has been around since the 1700s, has been amended 27 times."<sup id="cite_ref-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-2">&#91;2&#93;</a> <a href="#Opposition">Opponents</a> of Amendment 4 include the ACLU of Florida and the Florida League of Women Voters. The ACLU of Florida said, "[Amendment 4], disingenuously and misleadingly titled 'Voter Approval of Constitutional Amendments,' is a cynical political effort to obstruct voters’ ability to pass future constitutional amendments, even those with support from a supermajority of voters. This ballot initiative disregards the will of the people and renders their voices mute on the very issues they care about most." Ballotpedia did not identify any committees registered to oppose Amendment 4. <span class="mw-headline" id="What_is_the_current_election_process_for_constitutional_amendments_in_Florida.3F">What is the current election process for constitutional amendments in Florida? <dl><dd>See also: <a href="#State_processes_for_initiated_constitutional_amendments">State processes for initiated constitutional amendments</a> and <a href="#Constitutional_amendment_statistics_2006-2018">Constitutional amendment statistics 2006-2018</a></dd></dl> As of 2020, Florida is one of 18 states that require voters to approve a constitutional amendment at a single election. One state—Nevada—requires voter approval of citizen-initiated constitutional amendments at two successive elections. Since the <a href="#Process_in_Nevada">pass-it-twice requirement in Nevada</a> was created in 1962, there have been 14 citizen-initiated constitutional amendments that passed at the first election and appeared on the ballot again at the next election. Of the 14 measures, 12 were passed at their second elections (85.7%) and two failed (14.3%). Additionally, in every U.S. state except Delaware, constitutional amendments passed by the state's legislature must be referred to and approved by voters to become effective. Unlike the proposed change under Florida Amendment 4, the process in Nevada does not require voter approval of legislative referrals at more than one election. The current Florida constitution, adopted in 1968, has since been amended 140 times (including amendments via citizen initiative and via the legislature). Before the 60% supermajority vote requirement for constitutional amendments was adopted in 2006, the average number of amendments adopted was between 5 and 6 per election cycle. After 2006, the average was between 4 and 5 per election cycle.<sup id="cite_ref-flo_3-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-flo-3">&#91;3&#93;</a> <span class="mw-headline" id="Are_there_other_measures_like_this_on_the_2020_ballot.3F">Are there other measures like this on the 2020 ballot? <dl><dd>See also <a href="#Related_measures">Related measures</a></dd></dl> A <a href="/North_Dakota_Constitutional_Measure_2,_Require_Initiated_Constitutional_Amendments_to_be_Approved_by_the_Legislature_or_Passed_Twice_Amendment_(2020)" title="North Dakota Constitutional Measure 2, Require Initiated Constitutional Amendments to be Approved by the Legislature or Passed Twice Amendment (2020)">similar amendment</a> is on the 2020 ballot for voters in North Dakota, which would require initiated constitutional amendments passed by voters to be submitted to the legislature for approval. If the legislature rejects the amendment, the measure would be placed on the ballot again at the next statewide election and would become effective if approved by the voters a second time. <span class="mw-headline" id="Text_of_measure">Text of measure <span class="mw-headline" id="Ballot_title">Ballot title The ballot title is as follows:<sup id="cite_ref-initiative_4-0" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-initiative-4">&#91;4&#93;</a> <span class="mw-headline" id="Ballot_summary">Ballot summary The ballot summary is as follows:<sup id="cite_ref-initiative_4-1" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-initiative-4">&#91;4&#93;</a> <span class="mw-headline" id="Fiscal_impact_statement">Fiscal impact statement The fiscal impact statement for the amendment will appear on the ballot as follows:<sup id="cite_ref-6" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-6">&#91;6&#93;</a> <span class="mw-headline" id="Constitutional_changes">Constitutional changes <dl><dd><dl><dd> See also: <a href="/Article_XI,_Florida_Constitution" title="Article XI, Florida Constitution">Article XI, Florida Constitution</a></dd></dl></dd></dl> The measure would add amend Sections 5 and 7 of <a href="/Article_XI,_Florida_Constitution" title="Article XI, Florida Constitution">Article XI</a> of the <a href="/Florida_Constitution" title="Florida Constitution">Florida Constitution</a>. The following underlined text would be added. <span class="mw-headline" id="Readability_score">Readability score <dl><dd><dl><dd>See also: <a href="/Ballot_measure_readability_scores,_2020" title="Ballot measure readability scores, 2020">Ballot measure readability scores, 2020</a></dd></dl></dd></dl> Support Keep Our Constitution Clean PC is leading the campaign in support of the initiative.<sup id="cite_ref-initiative_4-2" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-initiative-4">&#91;4&#93;</a> Arguments .arguments-bm-widget { width: 100%; border: 1px solid black; } .arguments-bm-widget li { margin-bottom: 10px; }   <ul> <li>Jason Zimmerman, a lawyer for Keep Our Constitution Clean PC: &quot;By doing pass-it-twice, we think we can reduce the amount of ... whimsical constitutional amendments. [In Florida], there have been more than 140 constitutional amendments [since the 1960s]. The United States Constitution, which has been around since the 1700s, has been amended 27 times.&quot; <a href="https://news.wfsu.org/state-news/2019-11-26/as-pass-it-twice-ballot-initiative-gains-steam-florida-looks-to-nevada"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Keep Our Constitution Clean PC: &quot;Our goal is to ensure that voters are given the opportunity to fully understand the immediate and future impacts of any proposed changes to our state constitution.&quot; <a href="https://cleanconstitution.org/"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> </ul>

Opposition Opponents .ballot-measure-endorsements p { display: inline; } .ballot-measure-endorsements td { width: 35% !important;} .endorsements-header { margin-top: 10px !important; margin-bottom: 5px !important; } .ballot-measure-endorsements ul { margin-top: 0 !important; margin-bottom: 0 !important; } .split-cols-bm { columns: 2; -webkit-columns: 2; -moz-columns: 2; } @media screen and (max-width: 792px) { .split-cols-bm { columns: 1; -webkit-columns: 1; -moz-columns: 1; } }

<h4 class="endorsements-header">Political Parties <ul> <li>

Miami Dade Democratic Party <a href="https://www.miamidadedems.org/florida_2020_amendment_recommendations"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> </ul> <h4 class="endorsements-header">Organizations <ul> <li>

ACLU of Florida <a href="https://www.aclufl.org/en/campaigns/aclu-florida-2020-ballot-guide"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>

League of Women Voters of Florida <a href="https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-ne-amendment-four-keep-our-constitution-clean-money-20200909-6n6ok2vdvnhadcxyk2gdw5b7ey-story.html"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> </ul>

<span class="mw-headline" id="Arguments_2">Arguments .arguments-bm-widget { width: 100%; border: 1px solid black; } .arguments-bm-widget li { margin-bottom: 10px; }   <ul> <li>Ellen Freidin of Fair Districts Florida: &quot;We cannot let our guard down and allow the powerful to indulge their worst tendencies to grab all the control for themselves. Florida voters should see Number 4 for what it is, a shameless effort to take away the people’s control over what goes into our constitution. We simply cannot give up our most effective tool for change.&quot; <a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/article245751175.html"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>ACLU of Florida: &quot;Florida voters&#39; right to participate directly in our democracy is protected by Florida’s constitution. Yet, Ballot initiative #4 would impede that right and make it twice as hard and twice as expensive for Floridians’ voices to be heard.&quot; Ballot Initiative #4, disingenuously and misleadingly titled “Voter Approval of Constitutional Amendments,” is a cynical political effort to obstruct voters’ ability to pass future constitutional amendments, even those with support from a supermajority of voters. This ballot initiative disregards the will of the people and renders their voices mute on the very issues they care about most. Essentially, an amendment approved by Florida voters would not count unless it passed a second time in the next election. In other words, it negates the will of the people and requires them to try again a second time in order to get something passed. It is an effort to stifle the choices Floridians have made to improve our democracy. Florida voters have a right to participate directly in our democracy and that right is protected by Florida’s constitution. Yet, Ballot Initiative #4 would impede that right and make it harder for Floridians voices to be heard.&quot; <a href="https://aclufloridavoter.com/2020-ballot-positions-overview"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> </ul>

<span class="mw-headline" id="Media_editorials">Media editorials <span class="mw-headline" id="Support_2">Support Ballotpedia did not identify media editorials supporting Amendment 4. If you are aware of one, please send an email with a link to <a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external text" href="mailto:editor@ballotpedia.org">editor@ballotpedia.org</a>. <span class="mw-headline" id="Opposition_2">Opposition .arguments-bm-widget { width: 100%; border: 1px solid black; } .arguments-bm-widget li { margin-bottom: 10px; }   <ul> <li>Sun Sentinel Editorial Board: &quot;Amendment 4 is as bad as bad gets. It takes massive effort and money to get a constitutional amendment ratified, particularly with the 60 percent approval threshold. One election is enough. There is no good reason to make it twice as hard. ... Talk about keeping our Constitution clean, this initiative is unnecessary. It is political clickbait offered up by wealthy friends of President Donald Trump to echo his anti-immigrant agenda and lure like-minded voters to the polls.&quot; <a href="https://www.sun-sentinel.com/opinion/endorsements/fl-op-general-endorse-florida-amendment-one-four-20200902-74edmwzuszgu5ohjks5sulo6hi-story.html"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Orlando Sentinel Editorial Board: &quot;If No. 4 passes, back-to-back campaigns would become far too expensive for grass-roots organizations that want to change the constitution, while the opponents would get an automatic do-over. Citizens would be thrown out of the amendment ballgame, and the backers of No. 4 know that. ... No. 4 is nothing more than the latest attack in a long, relentless war — waged by the Florida Chamber of Commerce and their pals in the state Legislature — to cut regular Floridians out of the amendment process.&quot; <a href="https://www.orlandosentinel.com/opinion/endorsements/os-op-endorsement-amendment-4-state-constitution-two-votes-20200903-26ibtrrttvhbrm5qv6unnk7yce-story.html"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Herald-Tribune Editorial Board: &quot;[T]his is an attempt at major mischief. Political operatives who dislike voters&#39; ability to send direct orders to their Legislature through the amendment process would prefer to make the process more cumbersome and expensive and, above all, protracted. They want you to have to vote on every amendment proposal not once, but twice, so you can second-guess yourself in their favor. We recommend voting no.&quot; <a href="https://www.heraldtribune.com/story/opinion/editorials/2020/10/13/florida-ballot-initiatives-constitutional-amendments-mixed-bag/5966255002/"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Miami Herald Editorial Board: &quot;The odious goal of this proposal is to require constitutional amendments to be approved by the voters in two — two! — general elections in order to become effective. ... Its well-heeled backers want Floridians to have to vote twice, cynically betting on the real possibility that an amendment won’t get that supermajority the second time around. As bad faith goes, this is voter suppression at its finest. Vote NO on Amendment 4.&quot; <a href="https://www.miamiherald.com/opinion/editorials/article246374465.html"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Gainesville Sun Editorial Board: &quot;Amendment No. 4 on the ballot this fall would be the death knell for direct democracy in Florida. Voters should keep our state constitution free of this attempt by big-money interests to subvert the power of the people.&quot; <a href="https://www.theledger.com/story/opinion/2020/09/28/editorial-amendment-4-would-take-power-people/3529802001/"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Florida Today Editorial Board: &quot;Getting a proposal on the ballot is already a difficult and expensive task that requires the gathering of at least 766,200 petition signatures. Not to mention the Legislature has steadily made it harder to get initiatives on the ballot by, for example, limiting the amount of time a group has to collect signatures. If Amendment 4 passes, it&#39;s likely that only groups with a lot of money and backing from powerful interests would be able to amend the Florida Constitution.&quot; <a href="https://www.floridatoday.com/story/news/2020/10/13/florida-amendments-vote-amendment-4-newspaper-recommendation/5967484002/"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> <li>Tampa Bay Times Editorial Board: &quot;[T]here already are high hurdles for placing an amendment on the ballot; proposals by the Legislature need support by three-fifths of the membership, revision commissions meet only every 20 years and citizens&#39; initiatives face a host of financial and logistical barriers. Lawmakers also routinely ignore amendments that Florida voters approve (see: Conservation Lands, Felons&#39; Voting Rights). This is just another tool for the ruling class to remain unanswerable and out-of-touch. The Times Editorial Board recommends a No vote on Amendment 4.&quot; <a href="https://www.tampabay.com/opinion/2020/10/03/amendment-4-the-times-editorial-board-recommendation/"><i class="fa fa-external-link" aria-hidden="true"></i></a></li> </ul>

Polls <dl><dd><dl><dd>See also: <a href="/Ballotpedia%27s_approach_to_covering_polls" title="Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls">Ballotpedia's approach to covering polls</a> and <a href="/2020_ballot_measure_polls" title="2020 ballot measure polls">2020 ballot measure polls</a></dd></dl></dd></dl> Poll results for the measure are detailed below.<sup id="cite_ref-7" class="reference"><a href="#cite_note-7">&#91;7&#93;</a>

<span class="mw-headline" id="Campaign_finance">Campaign finance <dl><dd><dl><dd> See also: <a href="/Campaign_finance_requirements_for_Florida_ballot_measures" title="Campaign finance requirements for Florida ballot measures">Campaign finance requirements for Florida ballot measures</a></dd></dl></dd></dl> '''The campaign finance information on this page reflects the most <a href="#" class="customToolTip" customToolTipSource="#CustomToolTip4">recently scheduled reports processed by Ballotpedia</a> Campaign finance report filing deadlines vary by state. Scheduled deadlines are usually based on periodic requirements—such as monthly or quarterly reports—or certain lengths of time before and after elections. Some states require interim reports in response to contributions of a certain size in addition to scheduled reports. It is not uncommon for reports to be filed late for a given campaign finance deadline. , which covered through September 25, 2020.&#160;The <a href="#" class="customToolTip" customToolTipSource="#CustomToolTip5">deadline</a> Campaign finance report deadlines are set by law. It is not uncommon for reports to be filed after the deadlines. Ballotpedia updates the reports as soon as possible after the campaign finance filing deadline. for the next scheduled reports was October 9, 2020.'''

One committee is registered to support Amendment 4: Keep Our Constitution Clean PC. The committee reported $165,500 in cash contributions and $8.84 million in in-kind contributions, all from Keep Our Constitution Clean, Inc. The committee reported 160,131.36 in cash expenditures. Keep Our Constitution Clean PC reported in-kind contributions from Keep Our Constitution Clean, Inc. for signature gathering totaling $8.8 million. The total <a href="#Path_to_the_ballot">cost per required signature</a> (CPRS) for Amendment 4 was $11.48. Ballotpedia had not identified any committees registered to oppose Amendment 4. If you are aware of any opposition committees, please send an email with a link to <a target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener" class="external text" href="mailto:editor@ballotpedia.org">editor@ballotpedia.org</a>. .sbtotaltable { width: 50%; }  .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; }  .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; }  .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; }  .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; } <span class="mw-headline" id="Support_3">Support .sbtotaltable { width: 50%; }  .sbtotaltable th { font-size:1.2em; }  .sbtotaltable td { text-align:center; }  .sbtotalheader { background-color: black !important; color:white !important; font-size:1.0em; font-weight:bold; }  .sbtotaltotal { font-weight:bold; } <span class="mw-headline" id="Top_donors">Top donors Keep Our Constitution Clean, Inc. provided 100% of the contributions to the support campaign.