User:Fmonar/sandbox

Dialectic materialism and realism
Text generated from the Postmodernism Generator

DR. IVAN HO DEPARTMENT OF POLITICS, MISKATONIC UNIVERSITY, ARKHAM, MASS.

1. Realities of futility
In the works of Joyce, a predominant concept is the concept of conceptualist art. Therefore, the premise of realism holds that reality serves to exploit minorities. If neodialectic narrative holds, we have to choose between realism and the semantic paradigm of discourse.

The characteristic theme of Scuglia’s[1] critique of dialectic deconstruction is not narrative per se, but subnarrative. However, any number of structuralisms concerning the rubicon of precultural language may be discovered. The subject is interpolated into a neodialectic narrative that includes narrativity as a reality.

Therefore, the opening/closing distinction intrinsic to Joyce’s A Portrait of the Artist As a Young Man is also evident in Dubliners, although in a more self-supporting sense. The subject is contextualised into a modernist theory that includes reality as a paradox.

However, the main theme of the works of Joyce is a postsemiotic reality. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic materialism that includes consciousness as a whole.

In a sense, Porter[2] implies that we have to choose between dialectic construction and pretextual discourse. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic materialism that includes reality as a totality.

Therefore, realism holds that sexual identity has intrinsic meaning, given that consciousness is interchangeable with culture. Foucault suggests the use of neodialectic narrative to attack sexism.

2. Realism and cultural patriarchialism
“Society is part of the futility of reality,” says Bataille. But Marx’s essay on cultural patriarchialism states that the raison d’etre of the observer is significant form. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic materialism that includes truth as a paradox.

In the works of Gibson, a predominant concept is the distinction between destruction and creation. However, Sartre promotes the use of the postconstructivist paradigm of narrative to deconstruct and read class. If realism holds, the works of Gibson are not postmodern.

The characteristic theme of Tilton’s[3] analysis of cultural neosemioticist theory is not, in fact, narrative, but subnarrative. But the primary theme of the works of Gaiman is the role of the participant as poet. The meaninglessness, and eventually the genre, of dialectic materialism prevalent in Gaiman’s Death: The High Cost of Living emerges again in Sandman.

Therefore, Sontag suggests the use of cultural patriarchialism to attack hierarchy. Sartre uses the term ‘realism’ to denote a mythopoetical reality.

It could be said that the subject is contextualised into a dialectic materialism that includes culture as a paradox. Foucault uses the term ‘cultural patriarchialism’ to denote the role of the observer as writer.

In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a realism that includes sexuality as a whole. The premise of cultural patriarchialism holds that narrativity is used to entrench the status quo, but only if Debord’s essay on realism is valid; otherwise, art is capable of significance.

It could be said that Derrida uses the term ‘cultural theory’ to denote a self-fulfilling paradox. Bailey[4] implies that we have to choose between realism and deconstructivist postcapitalist theory.

However, in Black Orchid, Gaiman affirms dialectic materialism; in Neverwhere he reiterates cultural nihilism. Baudrillard promotes the use of dialectic materialism to modify truth.

3. Narratives of meaninglessness
“Class is intrinsically used in the service of outmoded, elitist perceptions of sexual identity,” says Lacan. Thus, an abundance of desublimations concerning Foucaultist power relations exist. The example of cultural patriarchialism depicted in Gaiman’s Stardust is also evident in Neverwhere, although in a more neotextual sense.

In the works of Gaiman, a predominant concept is the concept of dialectic language. But Marx uses the term ‘presemioticist theory’ to denote the difference between sexuality and class. Dialectic materialism states that consensus is a product of communication.

Therefore, the subject is contextualised into a textual paradigm of narrative that includes language as a totality. Bataille uses the term ‘dialectic materialism’ to denote the rubicon, and thus the economy, of neodialectic art.

It could be said that the premise of textual appropriation holds that class, perhaps ironically, has significance. The characteristic theme of Prinn’s[5] critique of dialectic materialism is not discourse, as Lacan would have it, but subdiscourse.

In a sense, in Stardust, Gaiman examines cultural patriarchialism; in Death: The Time of Your Life, however, he denies dialectic materialism. The subject is interpolated into a precapitalist socialism that includes language as a reality.

4. Cultural patriarchialism and conceptualist posttextual theory
“Society is part of the failure of culture,” says Debord; however, according to Drucker[6], it is not so much society that is part of the failure of culture, but rather the futility of society. However, if realism holds, we have to choose between dialectic materialism and patriarchial deconstruction. Any number of theories concerning the role of the artist as writer may be found.

“Sexual identity is fundamentally a legal fiction,” says Baudrillard. It could be said that Sartre uses the term ‘realism’ to denote not structuralism, but prestructuralism. The primary theme of the works of Gaiman is the role of the artist as poet.

If one examines conceptualist posttextual theory, one is faced with a choice: either reject realism or conclude that the law is capable of truth, but only if consciousness is equal to sexuality; if that is not the case, Sontag’s model of conceptualist posttextual theory is one of “Derridaist reading”, and therefore part of the absurdity of narrativity. In a sense, Foucault suggests the use of realism to challenge class divisions. Pickett[7] states that the works of Gaiman are reminiscent of Mapplethorpe.

Thus, many discourses concerning conceptualist posttextual theory exist. Lyotard uses the term ‘realism’ to denote the collapse, and hence the absurdity, of neotextual society.

However, any number of narratives concerning not deconstruction, as dialectic objectivism suggests, but subdeconstruction may be revealed. The subject is contextualised into a dialectic materialism that includes language as a totality.

In a sense, in Port of Saints, Burroughs deconstructs postcapitalist narrative; in The Ticket that Exploded, although, he affirms dialectic materialism. Baudrillard’s analysis of conceptualist posttextual theory holds that the significance of the reader is deconstruction.

But Lacan uses the term ‘the dialectic paradigm of consensus’ to denote the rubicon of subsemioticist sexual identity. The subject is interpolated into a dialectic materialism that includes culture as a paradox.

1. Scuglia, W. ed. (1992) Deconstructing Marx: Realism, capitalism and postcultural nihilism. O’Reilly & Associates

2. Porter, J. W. H. (1983) Realism in the works of Gibson. Panic Button Books

3. Tilton, J. ed. (1979) Reassessing Realism: Dialectic materialism in the works of Gaiman. Harvard University Press

4. Bailey, M. Z. B. (1998) Capitalism, the predialectic paradigm of consensus and realism. O’Reilly & Associates

5. Prinn, D. ed. (1970) The Meaninglessness of Sexual identity: Realism and dialectic materialism. University of Michigan Press

6. Drucker, G. Q. (1996) Realism in the works of Tarantino. University of Massachusetts Press

7. Pickett, W. P. B. ed. (1984) Contexts of Genre: Dialectic materialism in the works of Burroughs. Cambridge University Press

The essay you have just seen is completely meaningless and was randomly generated by the Postmodernism Generator. To generate another essay, follow this link. If you liked this particular essay and would like to return to it, follow this link for a bookmarkable page.

The Postmodernism Generator was written by Andrew C. Bulhak using the Dada Engine, a system for generating random text from recursive grammars, and modified very slightly by Josh Larios (this version, anyway. There are others out there).

This installation of the Generator has delivered 10903475 essays since 25/Feb/2000 18:43:09 PST, when it became operational.

More detailed technical information may be found in Monash University Department of Computer Science Technical Report 96/264: “On the Simulation of Postmodernism and Mental Debility Using Recursive Transition Networks“.

More generated texts are linked to from the sidebar to the right.

If you enjoy this, you might also enjoy reading about the Social Text Affair, where NYU Physics Professor Alan Sokal’s brilliant(ly meaningless) hoax article was accepted by a cultural criticism publication.

References: