User:Fnt7/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1
Content Sources and References Organization and Writing Quality Images and Media Talk Page Discussion Overall Impressions The article is a solid foundation for what is to come. There are good facts, good sources, and what little information there is is solid as well. The succinctness of the article is a strength, as it packs a lot of information in very few words. More information as to the cultural background of the dialect and the modern usage would make this article stronger. The article is not necessarily under-developed, but it could use more info and more research to make it feel complete.
 * Vivaro-Alpine Dialect
 * Article Evaluation
 * Lead Section
 * The introductory sentence is succinct and informs the reader in few words of exactly what the topic is
 * The lead does not include a summary of each section to come, but every sentence in the lead is tied to one of the sections to come; not every section is mentioned in the lead, but everything in the lead ties back to a section to come
 * The lead DOES contain info not found in the article: the name of the man who coined the name of the dialect is not found elsewhere in the article
 * Very concise
 * Very concise
 * The content is all relevant to the topic
 * Info is sourced from an article published as recently as 2018, but the rest of the citations are older--late 1990s, or earlier
 * I feel content pertaining to the culture that comes along with the dialect is lacking; characterization of the language versus "clean Italian" is plentiful, however
 * I do not believe the article addresses one of Wikipedia's equity gaps
 * Tone and Balance
 * The article is written impartially
 * There are no biased claims
 * There are no viewpoints either over-or-underrepresented
 * Minority and fringe viewpoints really are not discussed--there are no viewpoints, just facts
 * There is no opinion to sway readers to, so there is no attempt to sway readers
 * All sources are reliable
 * All sources are thorough
 * The sources are semi-current--could be more recent ones to be found
 * The articles are written by both men and women, all of whom are French, so the spectrum of diversity could be greater
 * For the most part, the sources are either journal articles or Endangered Language website pages already
 * The links do work
 * It is well-written (clear and concise)
 * I didn't find grammatical or spelling errors
 * Well-organized
 * There is only one image involved: a map of areas where the dialect is spoken
 * The image is well-captioned
 * Yes
 * Yes
 * Very rare conversations--one person asks if this dialect is the same as another dialect, and one other comment is simply a peer review of the article
 * It is a part of these projects: WikiProject Languages (rated stub-class), WikiProject France (rated start-class, mid-importance), and WikiProject Italy (no rating).
 * This question is N/A for me

Option 2

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources