User:Foojin Liu/sandbox

Shuangjian Policy
The Shuangjian Policy, also known as Double Alleviation Plolicy, is an education reform enacted by the Chinese government in 2021 aimed at reducing academic pressure on students. The policy proposes that, for the compulsory education stage, schools should reduce students' academic pressure, such as the amount of homework or frequent classes. For non-school educational institutions, the government requires unified registration as non-registered, and training institutions are not allowed to conduct capital operations, and training institutions are not allowed to take up student holidays (including winter and summer vacations) for training.In this topic, the background and specific practice of this policy will be mentioned, as well as the units and enterprises affected by this policy, such as "New Oriental" China's largest English training institution. The attitudes of students and parents towards this policy also need to be mentioned. Finally, there is a dispute over the need for the government to control educational institutions. This part needs to refer to how other countries treat private academic support.

Annotated bibliography
Thoughts on Double Alleviation Policy: A Background-based International Comparison of Shadow-education Policies     SIni WU

This article analyzes the attitudes of the governments of the United States, China and South Korea towards shadow education. The United States tends to cooperate with shadow education to improve the under-educated students, while China and South Korea prefer strict government control. This article is lacking in the selection of different regions, and I think it should be supplemented with the shadow education situation in Europe. In this article I learned that the relationship between the government and the private education market is not only educational, but also economic and cultural in different regions.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00131857.2022.2040481

This article attempts to analyze why the "double reduction policy" was introduced through three aspects, namely "student-centered education", "guarantee of education quality" and "collaboration between school and family education". This article is more about linking the double reduction policy with the two units of family and school, and explaining why the Chinese government is interfering in education in this seemingly tough way from the perspective of students and parents.

https://monitor.icef.com/2021/08/sweeping-new-rules-ban-for-profit-school-tutoring-in-china/

This article is more pointing to what happened outside the education industry under the double reduction policy. A series of financial issues related to VIPKID, a Chinese online teaching platform, reflect the high degree of commercialization of China's education market. And at the end of the article leads to another new motive, xenophobia. In this way, the Chinese government may want to restrict the teaching of foreign teachers in China, so as to ensure the ideology of students.

https://www.atlantis-press.com/proceedings/icela-21/125969932

This article does not directly discuss the double reduction policy but reflects another product developed under the double reduction policy, the photo searching application or the question search software. This article talks about the positive or negative impact on students, both of which can be used to discuss the feedback from the student community after the double-deduction policy was released.

https://www.abidjanprinciples.org

This article is an introduction to the basic information of Abidjan Principles, which claims that the government is obliged to actively guide citizens' right to education, including but not limited to ensuring the fairness of citizens' education. This is theoretical support for the release of the double reduction policy, but more is needed. For example, the double reduction policy does not mention the suppression of English learning and teaching in non-Chinese curriculum systems, which needs to be supplemented.