User:Fordhuntington1/Japanese mode/Miles at UofU Peer Review

Peer review
This is where you will complete your peer review exercise. Please use the following template to fill out your review.

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing? (provide username) Fordhuntington1
 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Fordhuntington1/sandbox

Lead
Guiding questions:


 * Has the Lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?
 * Does the Lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the article's topic?
 * Does the Lead include a brief description of the article's major sections?
 * Does the Lead include information that is not present in the article?
 * Is the Lead concise or is it overly detailed?

Lead evaluation
The article is so small that it appears that you plan on making changes to all of it. If you do change the structure of the article by adding sections, then it would be good to be able to summarize the contents with a strong Lead.

Content
Guiding questions:


 * Is the content added relevant to the topic?
 * Is the content added up-to-date?
 * Is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

Content evaluation
It looks like you already have a good grasp of the subject, but haven't started adding content yet.

Sources and References
Guiding questions:


 * Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?
 * Are the sources thorough - i.e. Do they reflect the available literature on the topic?
 * Are the sources current?
 * Check a few links. Do they work?

Sources and references evaluation
The links of the two sources did work, and they look like good sources to me. I can imagine it would be hard to find many sources for this article, but I think what you have is good enough to work with.

Overall impressions
Guiding questions:


 * Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article - i.e. Is the article more complete?
 * What are the strengths of the content added?
 * How can the content added be improved?

Overall evaluation
I can tell that you have a strong action plan, and have a lot of ideas in mind of how to improve the article. Just need to start working on the content and putting those plans into action. Just a reminder that as you do so to do it in a neutral tone.