User:FormallyTrainedHomunculus/Neurodiversity/Whitneyatwelle Peer Review

General info
Adrian Smith
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:Neurodiversity
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Neurodiversity

Evaluate the drafted changes
The lead paragraph already included a great framework for the definition and foundation for the topic. It did not add brief descriptions of all of the article's. major section, so it may be a good idea to include the ones that were excluded like Social Media and Clinical Settings. Overall, the lead is concise and not overly detailed. The content that was added is relevant to the topic and up to date, but I felt that the portion about ABA therapy was a little bias. I would advise adding a little bit more information about the benefits of ABA rather than just focusing on the negatives to make it more neutral. I think it might also be a good idea to add some more statistics about the prevalences of different disabilities that are included in Neurodiversity as well so people could see how many people are affected in the world. All of your added portions had citations that were properly referenced. Overall, I thought the information that you added was very helpful to the article. The only other idea I had would be to possibly add more information to the Controversy section since it is disproportionately smaller and does not have as much information compared to the other sections.