User:FormerIP/test


 * 1) A person who is notable only for committing a crime or crimes should not normally be the subject of a Wikipedia article if there are any exisiting articles that do or could incorporate the available encylopaedic material relating to that person.


 * 1) Where there are no such existing articles, such a person should be the subject of a Wikipedia article only if one of the following apply:


 * The victim is a renowned world figure, or immediate family member of a renowned world figure, including but not limited to politicians or worldwide celebrities. A good test for this (but not a necessary prerequisite) would be if the victim has an uncontested Wikipedia article that predates the alleged crime or death.


 * The motivation for the crime or the execution of the crime is unusual—or has otherwise been considered noteworthy—such that it is a well-documented historic event. Generally the historic significance is indicated by persistent coverage of the event in reliable secondary sources that devote significant attention to the individual's role.

''Note: Someone accused of a crime is not guilty unless and until this is decided by a court of law. Editors must give serious consideration to not creating an article on an alleged perpetrator until a conviction is secured.''