User:Formula23/Tafheet/Bibobeddz Peer Review

General info
Bibobeddz
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Formula23/Tafheet?veaction=edit&preload=Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
- Has the lead been updated to reflect the new content added by your peer?

It has not been updated to change the meaning of anything being said but updated grammar and spelling of Arabic words written in english. as well as introducing the dangers of Tafheet in an unbiased manner.

- Does the lead include an introductory sentence that concisely and clearly describes the articles topic?

yes it does.

- Does the lead include a brief description of the articles major sections?

Yes, and the additional annotations also help make a point.

- Does the lead include information that is not present in the article?

No.

- Is the lead concise or is it overly detailed?

It is concise but if it was necessary it could be shortened slightly

Content:

- Is the content added relevant to the topic?

Yes, very relavent.

- Is the content added up-to-date?

Sources are quite old, but it does not seem like newer sources are necessary because of the topic at hand.

- is there content that is missing or content that does not belong?

no there is not, as far as the reader is concerned all needed information is mentioned

- are there viewpoints that are overrepresented or underrepresented?

No, but the author talks about how dangerous it is in their edits but it is backed by data hence it is a balanced article expect part of it talks about the dangers which also happen to outweigh the positives. but there is nothing that the author can do about that because what they are saying is true and doesn't overpower other parts.

- does the article deal with one of wikipedias equity gaps? does it address topics related to historical underrepresented populations or topics?

yes, it is a topic that many people would not know about especially outside of the middle east, even people outside of the GCC might be unaware about it.

sources and references:

- Is all new content backed up by a reliable secondary source of information?

Yes it does indeed include a source which is Arab news which is reliable.

- Does the content accurately reflect what the cited sources say?

Yes, it does.

-are the sources thorough. do they reflect the available literature on the topic?

yes it is thorough and does reflect what other sources say as-well.

- are the sources current?

relavent to the time period which concerns the topic

- Are the sources written by a diverse spectrum of authors?

No, and not all sources have been provided

- are there better sources available, such as pee reviewed articles in place of news coverage or random sites?

not many that comes to find, his work stand out because it is a topic which he cares about

- check a few links? do they work.

Yes, all the links provided work.

organization:

- is the content added well-written

yes it is written very well

- does the content added have any gramatical error

no it does not

- Is the content added well-organized

yes it is all added in a reasonable place

images and media N/a