User:Forthepurposesofnotbeingcalledspam

Why? It's not misleading, inflammatory, or defamatory. Nothing's been vandalised, no warning's been given. Way to go with the democratic wiki - this appears to be stretching the policy to its most aggressive limits. Exactly why is that name a violation? 203.173.29.200 03:47, 19 March 2006 (UTC)