User:Foucauldienspirit/Lady Lazarus/Applesandbanana Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Foucauldienspirit


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Foucauldienspirit/Lady Lazarus


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Lady Lazarus

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

The author created a new section called article body and worked on the Illustrations of Plath's depression during WW2 section. I personally think that the heading name Article Body can be worked on as it is a bit too brief and doesn't give much insight as too what the content of the information is. The author mentioned that the current Illustrations of Plath's depression during WW2 section contains no citations and sources to back the information given and further suggested to delete the section. I agree with the authors decision to delete the section. Overall. I do think that the author improved the content of the article. There is now a lot more cited information and general content to the article.