User:Fpersiani/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Sarcoplasm

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I chose it because it is an essential part of muscle fibers and important to the human body, yet does not have a very thorough article written for it. The sources (only 3) are fairly up to date (within the last 10 years).

Evaluate the article
Lead Section:

This article gives a brief introduction and defines scaroplasm. It does not prelude to later sections of the article because they do not exist.

Content:

The existing content on this article is relevant, but very brief. It does not really span beyond the introductory paragraph.

Tone and Balance:

This article provides a neutral tone throughout its short paragraph.

Sources and references:

The sources in this article are up to date, but there is not a variety of them. It would be necessary

Organization and writing quality:

This article is concise, but almost too concise. I do think it could go into much larger detail and include other sections to elaborate on.

Images and Media:

The article only contains one image that is not of great quality. To make this article better, it is necessary to update the image used and add more diagrams for clarity.

Talk Page:

The major issue on the talk page is that of the image used. In order to have a clearer and better page, updating the photo is very important. Other than the photo, there is not much discussion on the Talk page.

Overall impressions:

This article needs a lot of work. It is very short (does not go beyond the introduction) and lacks details for clarity. In order to be a better article, the image should be updated, and there should be broken down sections that cover the major points.