User:Francessus/Equity and Inclusion in Education/KennyOkg Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

(provide username) Francessus


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Francessus/Equity_and_Inclusion_in_Education


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Lead section:
The topic of the article is well defined and the easy to understand. The lead can be separated from the body of the article to demarcate it and to introduce the topic.

Content:
The content is relevant and up to date

Tone and balance:
The tone is generally neutral; please check the last sentence with 'cultural differences and beliefs strongly influence the creation'.. this could be regarded as a biased phrase; 'strongly influence' and a more neutral tone can be used.

Sources and reference:
The reference are all well cited and are relevant to the article topic. The years of publication of all the cited articles and resources referenced are not added to the references. The cited sentences in the body of the article are not linked to each other. The references are standing alone and may be linked to show the different authors are addressing same issue.

Organization:
The content is clear, concise and easy to read. The content can be separated into sections for more clarity.

Images and media
The links are all active and worked very well. The selected YouTube media, do they follow the creative commons law?

Overall, this is very good work.