User:FranksValli/Archive1

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia!

Here are some tips to help you get started:


 * If you haven't already, please add your name to the new user log to let others know a little about yourself.
 * Read the Tutorial, and feel free to experiment in the Sandbox.
 * Eventually, you might want to read the Manual of Style and Policies and Guidelines.
 * If you need help, post a question at the Help Desk or ask me on my talk page.
 * Explore, be bold in editing pages, and, most importantly, have fun!

Good luck! Jrdioko

P.S. One last helpful hint. To sign your posts like I did above (on talk pages, for example) use the '~' symbol. To insert just your name, type &#126;&#126;&#126; (3 tildes), or, to insert your name and timestamp, use &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (4 tildes).

Moved WWI Aviation
No offense, but I moved WWI Aviation to World War I Aviation, which seemed like a better title for an interesting article. (The old title still works as a redirect.) Just letting you know so you can change the link on your User page. RussBlau 18:01, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Ca.60
Hi Franks - When a page has been noted as a possible copyright violation, you should not remove the notice. If you want to submit a revised version of the article, you should do so on a temporary subpage. As you've correctly surmised, it's the direct copying of the text that you identify as "the info section" that is the first problem.

All material submitted to Wikipedia must be available under the GFDL licence, or another copyright licence that is compatible with it. This is because Wikipedia is intended to be a free resource that anyone is allowed to copy for any purpose. That means that (for example) if someone wants to extract all the aircraft articles from Wikipedia, compile them into a CD-ROM or even a printed book, and sell them for profit, they're perfectly allowed to do so. This is why we can't be supplying other people's copyrighted text - the owner of the material must be happy not only for Wikipedia to use the material, but for anyone, anywhere to use the material for whatever they like.

At the end of the day, in this particular instance, it's only two sentences of text. Surely you can rewrite this in your own words?

The photos are more problematic - Italian photographs are protected by copyright for 70 years after the death of the photographer, or for 70 years after first publication in the case of a photo that is first published anonymously. If these two photos were originally published anonymously, or if the person who took them died before 1935, then there's no problem - do you have any way of checking this? --Rlandmann 7 July 2005 23:38 (UTC)

List of World War I flying aces
Hi,

I just thought i'd inform you that i've added a template to the United Kingdom section in an attempt to make that section look easier on the eye. Hopefully you like it. If so, do you want templates for the other sections?

Take care, SoLando 18:16, 9 September 2005 (UTC)


 * Good, i'm glad :-) Well, i'll start on a template for Canada soon (looks complete, though I'll check "The Aeredrome" site to check). I have way too many articles half-finished right now :-( Anyway, great work on the list. I'd really appreciate any help you can give :-)


 * Take care, SoLando 22:27, 9 September 2005 (UTC)

Bristol F.2 Fighter picture!
Glad you liked it! Ian Dunster 11:26, 4 October 2005 (UTC)

Deontological ethics
I just wanted to thank you for your very helpful and forthright attitude in editing this article. Many people find my habit of reverting good-faith edits I disagree with to be rather boorish, which I'm sorry for- it's not my intent. I just want you to know that I greatly appreciate your not taking it personally and discussing the matter civilly to a beneficial conclusion. Keep it up! :-) ⟳ ausa کui × 10:25, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Regarding Jmac800's
Dude stop assuming that all these people are white based of facial characteristics that is plain racsim. Just because many people in Greece today are white hod do you know that was the case 2000+ years ago (unsigned by User:Jmac800)


 * This is your own method of determining race, which I'm criticizing. If you agree it is racism then stop editing articles using this criteria.  FranksValli 18:42, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

- So you are bnasically tring to call me a liar. All of the people who I have claimed were black O have provided resources. There are plenty of people who assert Beethoven(Moor) and SS was black. Even the british government confirmed this in its muesuem.


 * Where did I call you a liar? FranksValli 23:03, 23 October 2005 (UTC)

Requesting images
stub need image as been deleted as per WP:SFD; however you can use Reqimage on the talk page for much the same purpose. --Mairi 06:43, 7 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Sorry no one let you know sooner; probably no one thought to check the history. Hope someone gets those images soon! --Mairi 05:40, 8 November 2005 (UTC)

Great job with the Infobox


The first barnstar I've given anyone, for taking the time to politely contact me when you spotted my bitching, having the open-mindedness and patience to read through my pages of criticism, and making the changes Template:Infobox Philosopher so desperately needed, all in a much more civil tone than I'll ever be capable of. You are one awesome dude; keep it up. -Silence 20:34, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Re: Wikipedia e-mail (ip:4.79.137.123)
I'm sorry that you got blocked as a side effect. There is an open proxy at which uses that IP address. Such proxies are routinely blocked due to abuse. Unfortunately, blocks on a IP address also affect logged in users. I have unblocked the IP address; it can be temporarily blocked again later if needed. Of course, it would be best if the open proxy were closed or configured to not be able to edit Wikipedia. --cesarb 22:52, 10 November 2005 (UTC)

Ibn Hazm
Hey. That anon who keeps reverting... well, does he have a point with the birth date? Where did you get November from? On the picture he's wrong. In any case, thanks for fixing the box. gren グレン 21:16, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Hi - I'm not sure the anon user has a point, but I found the dates on an Encyclopedia Brittanica article on Ibn Hazm. I left a note on the anonymous user's page to discuss this on Talk:Ibn Hazm.  Thanks for helping revert - hopefully we can get this sorted out!  --FranksValli 21:45, 16 November 2005 (UTC)


 * Thanks, I just hadn't seen where you got the date and I thought maybe the anon disagreed... but, since you got it from Britannica it seems that the anon can have no point. gren グレン 21:47, 16 November 2005 (UTC)

Template:Philosophy topics RfC
We have a content dispute issue. Please comment on the talk page. This message is being sent out to everyone who didn't vote Delete in the last TfD of the template, ie: User:SimonP User:Jules.lt User:Pjacobi User:thames User:Michael User:Christopherparham User:FranksValli User:Silence User:Andymussell User:Moosh88 User:Rick Norwood User:Izehar

It's not so much a content dispute (that's been ongoing, and will continue to go on, regardless) as it is a fight over the title and tag name of the template. I think the two should be identical, for simplicity's sake. Also, "Philosophy Quick Topic Guide" is easier to refer to than "that box with 'Philosophy' at the top of it". Please help resolve this issue. Go for it! 01:47, 25 November 2005 (UTC)

Urgent deletion issue
Hi, I created the Philosophy (navigation) template, and I voted for saving it too (as an IP). However, when I duplicated the template to adopt a new tag name, Infinity0 had a cow. We've been in an edit war since I started the template, and we escalated our battle to TfD, which was a big mistake, for now the whole project (both templates) is at risk because some people are voting to delete both. Meanwhile Infinity0 and I are voting to delete each other's TfD candidates, ironically pushing the delete votes for both templates into the majority. We need your help. Neither of us want both templates to die.

Here are the reasons to choose the "Philosophy Quick Topic Guide" tag:
 * Both templates are identical, as changes are ported after each round of disputes, to keep them that way. We've nearly come to a compromise on the few edits that we are still at odds over, but Infinity0 is one stubborn kid. Our competition has improved the template continuously, which is a good thing.
 * The conversion of the old tag to the new tag is complete.
 * The new tag has placement in Wikipedia articles. It is hooked in to the top level of the Philosophy hierarchy, and then some.
 * The old tag has virtually no placement in any Wikipedia articles. It's discussion page link sits on a bunch of users' talk pages, and that's about it.  And since I placed most of the old tags, it didn't seem out of place for me to upgrade them.
 * Since the content of the templates are identical, and the fact that jousting will continue on whichever template wins, it makes sense to vote for the one that maintains the project's presence on Wikipedia.

Please vote to save the template: click here. For further discussions click here

Go for it! 04:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

Jesus
Check out the Jesus article and edit it to keep it focused on Jesus and a biographical account of Him. Watch the Jesus page to keep it focused on Him. Thank you. Scifiintel 21:55, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

Re: Vandalism
No problem, it's all part of the service :) Sparky 00:55, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

re: Edit to Epicurus
Wow, quick responce!

Is the style of singular nouns on Wikipedia limited to wiki? I've been told that with anchient names, an apostrophe is acceptable. Or is that not a factor considered in wiki? thanks

Hmm, and I though I'd start off with something small, that nobody would notice as my first wikipedia edit. Oops. tinfoil

'pedantries' might be a pedantic word, but I'm pretty sure it isn't a "pedantric" word.

dictionary help
'pedantries' might be a pedantic word, but I'm pretty sure it isn't a "pedantric" word.


 * I see. Thanks!  --FranksValli 15:26, 9 December 2005 (UTC)

Ibn Hazm
Silence removed the philosopher infobox and I reverted. I don't particularly care about the issue but I found the move to be too abrupt for a user that didn't edit the article. If you agree that it should be removed I have no problem with that, but I feel you should be able to weigh in. Could you go to the talk page and give your opinion on the matter? Thanks. gren グレン 10:40, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Hermann Göring photo and reference
i don't view this humorful use of a Nazi appropriate (that was your intent, humor, no?).

a similarly poor choice would be Hitler. unless you were South Park and using hyperbole to make a point. but certainly not when attempting to be a mediator, editor, etc. of high regard.

otherwise a nice page....best. (user: only visited from Chomsky photo link; won't likely return.)


 * There are very few things in the world that are inoffensive to everyone, and I'm sorry this one offended you. More importantly though, when something is out of bounds in humour, it gives that something a certain power and reverance.  For instance, you might refrain from telling a religious joke because of a certain reverance - in doing so you acknowledge its power.  The Nazis don't deserve this reverence.  To refrain from telling jokes about them sets them apart from everything else and gives them power.  To tell jokes about them is to bring them down on the level, or even sub-level, where they belong.  I take what the Nazi's did very seriously, as it could happen again.  As for the Nazi's themselves, I have never taken them seriously.  FranksValli 13:52, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

Copyright.
commons:Image:Thales2.jpg also appears elsewhere. I accept that the bust is old, but who took the picture? I believe you should look at LoopZilla

Image Tagging for Image:Fokker_D.VIII.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Fokker_D.VIII.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use GFDL to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as db-unksource.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 10:36, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:DavidsonDonald.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:DavidsonDonald.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:09, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

I would love your help.
Hi,

I know you are interested in christianity, and I recently started a new wiki over at wikicities which is on the subject of christianity. Christian Knowledge Base is the site.

The goal is to have a knowledgebase on christianity from a distinctly "C(hristian)POV" rather than the NPOV. It is not meant to be a mere Christian Encyclopedia, but to foster a real sense of community. I'd like to include things like current events, news, stories, and anything that would add to both an understanding of Christianity, but also its enjoyment. I'm looking for help to build a resource that could really enrich the lives of Christians.

I know you are busy but I am actively seeking new sysops/admins to help me build this site up, and I would be positively thrilled if you could contribute in any capacity whatsoever. nsandwich 05:51, 24 March 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, FranksValli! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page.  F e  tofs  Hello! 00:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks
Heya, thanks a lot for the support on the sophia star. :) -- infinity  0  22:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

Greetings from WikiProject The Beatles!
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? - It's all here

Need help in discussing a list
Greetings; if you would visit the call for discussion at this page, I'd be grateful for your input. Thanks! Talk:List_of_German-language_philosophers Best, Universitytruth 13:21, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

VandalProof 1.2 Now Available
 After a lenghty, but much-needed Wikibreak, I'm happy to announce that version 1.2 of VandalProof is now available for download! Beyond fixing some of the most obnoxious bugs, like the persistent crash on start-up that many have experienced, version 1.2 also offers a wide variety of new features, including a stub-sorter, a global user whitelist and blacklist, navigational controls, and greater customization. You can find a full list of the new features here. While I believe this release to be a significant improvement over the last, it's nonetheless nowhere near the end of the line for VandalProof. Thanks to Rob Church, I now have an account on test.wikipedia.org with SysOp rights and have already been hard at work incorporating administrative tools into VandalProof, which I plan to make available in the near future. An example of one such SysOp tool that I'm working on incorporating is my simple history merge tool, which simplifies the process of performing history merges from one article into another. Anyway, if you haven't already, I'd encourage you to download and install version 1.2 and take it out for a test-drive. As always, your suggestions for improvement are always appreciated, and I hope that you will find this new version useful. Happy editing! --AmiDaniel (talk) 02:22, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 2, June 2006
Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? - It's all here

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 3, July 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Image tagging for Image:About_1930.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:About_1930.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:23, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 4, August 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Image tagging for Image:Frankie_valli.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Frankie_valli.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 09:03, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Please disambiguate your Beatles Article
the reference to the High Court has been replicated over Wikipedia. it whould ref to High Court as there are numerous High Courts. Can you pls fix. ta FedLawyer 12:38, 12 August 2006 (UTC)

Earth Handle
This article was deleted because it read as a joke advert and not as a notable subject.  (aeropagitica)   (talk)   21:02, 29 August 2006 (UTC)

Red BAron
Hey man,

looks like we have simialr interest. Mostly philosophy, christianity and red baron.

The servers are still very much populated!

stop by my squadron http://rnas.pk5.net/forums/index.php

Leave a message

Image:Hermann_Wilhelm_Goering_Offiziell.jpg
I don't think you should flip the image. People's faces are not symmetric and accuracy (for example, the handedness of the Swastika) is more important than stylistic considerations.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 5, September 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 6, October 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Image tagging for Image:John_Dewey.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:John_Dewey.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 10:31, 11 November 2006 (UTC)


 * Fixed. FranksValli 18:37, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 7, November 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 8, December 2006

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Unspecified source for Image:About 1930.gif
Thanks for uploading Image:About 1930.gif. I notice the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this file yourself, then there needs to be a justification explaining why we have the right to use it on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you did not create the file yourself, then you need to specify where it was found, i.e., in most cases link to the website where it was taken from, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the file also doesn't have a copyright tag, then one should be added. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Fair use, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following [ this link]. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —Angr 11:43, 28 December 2006 (UTC)

Excellent clarification
Thank you very much for your excellent clarification about the naturalistic fallacy and the is/ought problem. I have not edited the article one bit; clearly the way the article is now ought to be the way it should be. ;-) - Abscissa 21:17, 1 January 2007 (UTC)


 * No prob - I'm glad it helped :) FranksValli 03:20, 3 January 2007 (UTC)

List of World War I books
Thank you for the contribution ! Octopus-Hands 14:15, 6 January 2007 (UTC)


 * No prob :) FranksValli 22:21, 6 January 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

Orphaned fair use image (Image:DavidLewis.jpg)
Thanks for uploading Image:DavidLewis.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 10:21, 29 January 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Biola.gif)
Thanks for uploading Image:Biola.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 04:29, 3 February 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 10, February 2007

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

delivered by ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 02:57, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Stephen W. Thompson
Thanks for adding the source to my article about the first victory Bobby Jim

WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 11, March 2007

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

delivered by ++Larbot - run by User:Lar - t/c 00:22, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

Image tagging for Image:Jesse james1.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:Jesse james1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:07, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox Muslim scholars
Hi, I made this template on the basis of Template talk:Infobox Philosopher, but there are some mistakes in it. Can you please help me with it?-- Sa.vakilian(t-c) 03:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
 * I tried to correct it. Can you please check it.-- Sa.vakilian(t-c) 04:53, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

News Time

 * Want to help on next month's newsletter? Don't want to receive these in future? Don't want it subst'd next time? – It's all here.

BetacommandBot 23:45, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Little context in Selected philosophy anniversaries
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Selected philosophy anniversaries, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Selected philosophy anniversaries is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Selected philosophy anniversaries, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Selected philosophy anniversaries itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:17, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Johndryden.jpg
Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Johndryden.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 11:17, 16 June 2007 (UTC)

Hume and Cicero
Nice edit. I can't believe Cicero, of all people, wasn't on the list of Hume's influences. Postmodern Beatnik 16:13, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Sartre sig.png
Thanks for uploading Image:Sartre sig.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Media copyright questions. 19:09, 1 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Adler1963.jpg
I have tagged Image:Adler1963.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 05:21, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Adler1992.jpg
I have tagged Image:Adler1992.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. MER-C 05:22, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

Image:Roberthutchins.jpg
I have tagged Image:Roberthutchins.jpg as no rationale, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. Thank you. Videmus Omnia Talk  16:38, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rand_donahue.jpg listed for deletion
An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rand_donahue.jpg, has been listed at Images and media for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Abu badali (talk) 22:04, 22 August 2007 (UTC)

Image source problem with Image:Biola logo.png
This is an automated message from a robot. You have recently uploaded Image:Biola logo.png. The file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the GFDL-self tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 18:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. If you believe you received this message in error, please notify the bot's owner. OsamaKBOT 18:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox WWIAircraft Metric
Hi, I just noticed that a template you created, Template:Infobox WWIAircraft Metric, is unused and appears to be abandoned. I've marked it as deprecated, meaning it'll be deleted in two weeks' time if nobody objects. If there's a reason to keep it please leave a note at Wikipedia talk:Deprecated and orphaned templates and feel free to remove the deprecated tag from the template. Thanks. Bryan Derksen 10:04, 8 November 2007 (UTC)

Your School Of Athens JPEG
Hi. The high-resolution version of your uploaded seems to be corrupt. Could you re-upload it? Grjako 12:44, 11 November 2007 (UTC)


 * (Hope this is the right way to respond.) Only the top 591 pixels are delivered, regardless of computer, OS, browser, or location (tested in multiple offices and homes and cities). (Yes, did attempt to refresh, and force refresh.) Grjako 14:31, 12 November 2007 (UTC)


 * All links to the full-resolution version download only a 523.4-KB file. Are you able to download it successfully from multiple machines and locations? Grjako 08:06, 13 November 2007 (UTC)


 * Hm. Well, I believe you, of course. Might you be able to put a copy up on another web server so I can test it that way? Grjako 09:28, 16 November 2007 (UTC)

Request
I saw you uploaded the School of Athens jpeg and it is great! Could you possibly do the same thing (i.e., download and stitch the image together) for The Last Judgment (Michelangelo) from the Vatican's website. The current picture isn't as good. I would do it, but I have no idea how to begin. Remember 17:25, 15 November 2007 (UTC)
 * Awesome. Thanks for all the hard work. Remember 22:04, 15 November 2007 (UTC)

WikiProject The Beatles
Your user name is on the “Inactive, or have just popped out for a cup of tea...” list on the Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles page. You can move it back to the “Participants” list if you feel this is not the case. :) -- WikiProject The Beatles 15:13, 28 November 2007 (UTC)