User:Fransan2021/Dictyosphaeria versluysii/Aydenc2004 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Fransan2021


 * Link to draft you're reviewing: :https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fransan2021/Dictyosphaeria_versluysii
 * Link to the current version of the article:
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictyosphaeria_versluysii
 * https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dictyosphaeria_versluysii

Evaluate the drafted changes
Please answer the following questions in detail addressed to the classmate whose article you are reviewing. Remember this is constructive feedback, so be polite and clear in your suggestions for improving their article. We are all working together to improve the Wikipedia pages for the amazing species.

Use a different font style (bold or italic) for your answers so it is easy for the author to see your comments!


 * 1) First, what does the article do well? (Think about content, structure, complementing the existing article, writing, etc.)
 * 2) * So far, the article introduces the subject well.
 * 3) Check the main points of the article:
 * 4) * Does the article only discuss the species the article is about? (and not the genus or family)
 * 5) ** The article introduces the genus and family.
 * 6) * Are the subtitles for the different sections appropriate?
 * 7) ** There isn’t enough info for there to be multiple sections, but tat does allow for you to organize it however you want.
 * 8) * Is the information under each section appropriate or should anything be moved?
 * 9) * Is the writing style and language of the article appropriate? (concise and objective information for a worldwide audience)
 * 10) ** The writing style makes it easy and possible for non-native English speakers to read and understand.
 * 11) Check the sources:
 * 12) * Is each statement or sentence in the text linked to at least one source in the reference list with a little number?
 * 13) ** Yes
 * 14) * Is there a reference list at the bottom?
 * 15) ** Yes
 * 16) * Is each of those sources linked with a little number?
 * 17) ** Yes
 * 18) * What is the quality of the sources?
 * 19) ** The info comes from the World Register of Marine Species, which is a credible database for marine organisms.
 * 20) Give some suggestions on how to improve the article (think of anything that could be explained in more details or with more clarity or any issues addressed in the questions above):
 * 21) * What changes do you suggest and how would they improve the article?
 * 22) ** I suggest adding more information, basic things like average size and habitat.
 * 23) * Is the article ready for prime-time and the world to see on Wikipedia? If not, how could the author improve the article to be ready?
 * 24) ** This article is not ready but can easily be improved.
 * 25) What's the most important thing the author could do to improve the article?
 * 26) The most important thing is context for the organism.
 * 27) Did you notice anything about the article you reviewed that could be applicable to your own article?