User:Freebeast24/Post-traumatic growth/Dandelions-love-to-fly Peer Review

General info
Freebeast24
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Freebeast24/Post-traumatic growth
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Post-traumatic growth

Evaluate the drafted changes
I thought everything your article was very relevant to the topic and I loved how you already had a picture. The article flowed really well and I learned a lot from it! There wasn't any bias information all of it was very factual and straight to the point. All of the links to your citations work very well and the references are all came from a reliable, and not bias. These sources came from current reliable sources and are not bias.(European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation, Handbook of Posttraumatic Growth: Research and Practice, and Clinical Psychology Review)

I think the first paragraph was very well written but could use different citations and because there was only one source used for all of the information. I do understand that it can be really to find more reliable sources. I think you could add a little more detail in characteristics of PTG. You could also add a little bit more about how the PTG models works. Overall really good job looks great! :)

~

Dandelions-love-to-fly