User:Freeski14/Evaluate an Article

Evaluation of my lab partner's article by Hannah Rondeau.

I think Addy's evaluation of the article is very precise. She touched on every main point, and I believe that she is good to go.

https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Labile_cell&oldid=1021135233
(Provide a link to the article here.)

== I chose this article because I noticed that it was rather short and that it was edited earlier this year due to a previous mistake, so I suspected there could possibly be more mistakes to revise. In addition, it is a rather short article that appears to be in need of some more information. There is an excess of information and content to be provided for labile cells, which are constantly dividing cells throughout life. ==

(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)


 * The leading section of this article is efficient and does not include unnecessary information.
 * Although stable cells and permanent cells are the two other kinds of cells involved in cell division, I do not think it is productive to mention them unless a brief description in which their differences are defined is provided as well.
 * Additionally, I find the description of the cell division process to be too brief and difficult to follow along. It is unclear to me what each of the two daughter cells is responsible for after cell division from reading just this article. I also think that a more in-depth description of the cell's cycle, including its decreased G0 phase, should be provided.
 * I think it would also be useful to provide specific examples of the adverse effects that cytotoxic drugs can have against labile cells in different parts of the body.
 * The article does not display any biased opinions and certainly remains neutral, which is good.
 * The most recent reference retrieved in this article was from 2016, so some more recent citations could possibly be included.
 * The article could be structured slightly better; the first paragraph contains a lot of information while the following two paragraphs are rather brief.
 * While the image that is provided in the article is a good one, I think that there are some other useful images that could be added to the article, such as the cell cycle of a labile cell, displaying the fast G0 phase (or, sometimes, absent).
 * Although it is not difficult or an extensive process to clearly define what labile cells are and their function, I do think a lot more information could be incorporated to further increase the reader's understanding of the topic.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)