User:Frenchfrygirl2/Ballerina skirt/Crystia12 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Frenchfrygirl2


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Frenchfrygirl2/Ballerina skirt


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Ballerina skirt

Evaluate the drafted changes
Has the content added improved the overall quality of the article- i.e is the article more complete?

- The content added has improved the overall content of the article. For one the editor has created two new sections. The editors have also added a substantial amount of new information to the only current section of the article which is history. The editors have also added three new pictures to the article. The editors have made the article feel more complete than before. Only thing to add is include a lead or a article body.

Does the article include images that enhance understanding of the topic?

the article has added three new images for the article "Ballerina Skirt"". The images enhance the understanding of the topic. The editor shows at least two ways the skirt is being used. The images correlated great with the text of the article. The history section has an image of Serena Williams using the skirt to show the evolution and difference of uses the clothing can fulfill. The only thing that should be added is one or two more pictures for the section ‘types of ballerina skirts” so the reader can see the differences between the other skirts.

Is the content added well-organized- i.e. broken down into sections that reflect the major points of the topic?

The content added is well organized and reflects the major points of the topic. The new intro gives the basic function of the ballerina skirt. The history section gives more major points about the history of the skirt. The only thing to add or change would be for the “Types of Ballerina Skirt”. I would have a list of skirts and give them a definition and history of their function.