User:Frenchtoast350/Coquitlam River/AbigaleJ Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

SavannahShir/Coq River Sandbox


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:SavannahShir/Coq River Sandbox


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
I think the structure and the logic of this draft are good. It covers the important contents of the Coquitlam River. The most surprising thing to me is the detailed introduction of the ecology part. After future improvements, this part will be meaningful.

Through reading the draft, I have a better understanding of the Coquitlam River. In addition to its characteristics, I also know its relevance to the surrounding environments, organisms and human activities. These things increase the ecological and social value of the Coquitlam River.

A small suggestion is to add some general characteristics ​​to the lead part, such as the total length and the total area. Besides, you can also add a brief description of the river basin in the lead section. Adding some pictures or maps can help readers understand the detailed introduction in the Setting Part. For the Ecology part, it would be more interesting to add photos of several organisms.

The tone of the article is neutral, providing readers with a lot of detailed information. Through the Reference part, we can find that the information and opinions of the entire article are diverse. If there are a few more journals or books, the article will be more serious. I think the description of discharge and flooding in the Setting part is too detailed, so there is no need to provide too much data.

The structure and content of the whole article are awesome. I am looking forward to a complete version.