User:Freshwater598/Soil contamination/Kelliecarblue Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

Freshwater598


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Freshwater598/Soil contamination
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Soil contamination

Lead
The suspected contamination part does and good job at saying what could be done if contamination is suspected. Think that before mentioning that some background information at the beginning might be useful to readers.

Content
Diving up the information by country was a great idea. When reads scroll down the page It is easy to pick out what they would be looking for. The countries could be listed in ABC order.

Background info could be included about soil contamination at the begin before going into clean up.

Tone and Balance
The information for each country is not bias. Does a good job at mentioning the information for each country and not just focusing on one or having a lot of info in one and two sentences in another. Good amount of information in each

Sources and References
Sources good. The second one is form 1982 just thought I would mention it incase you have found more recent information. There is a red line after source 11.

Organization
Good about dividing up the countries and have a good amount of information in each one. Might want to put the countries into ABC order.

Images and Media
N/A

Overall
Did a good job. I like the paragraph for each country. Think more could be added to background and put it has the lead for the article.