User:Frey910/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Provide a link to the article here.)

Vaccination

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose this article to evaluate because it's important. While it does potentially save lives, it is also a controversial topic, so I thought it would be interesting to take a look at it.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

From a reader's perspective, there are plenty of sources used to write this article, and based on the last date updated, it's also up-to-date. However, since I did not visit every sources nor tried to find whether the sources or medias used adhere to copyrights, I will assume that they do. I think the article is concise (as concise as a topic of this size can be) with various links relating to the subject, and I haven't found grammatical errors during my reading.

The tone seems to be neutral, though in the 'Usage' section, I wished there was more information other than just the United States. The Talk page discusses the various aspects of vaccination that could be improved, added, or touched upon more. The article is well-organized with different sections on the topic. However, some do need more work than others (such as 'Usage' section, which only really shows the United States).

Overall, the article is well-written, and does present various perspectives (such as the ease of access to it for different groups/countries based on things such as GDP), though they don't go into it too much, so more information relating to underrepresented groups/countries could improve the article. It also presents different aspects of vaccination, such as its side effects, ingredients, policies and contrervercies that comes with it, among other things. It also briefly touches more recent issues such as Covid-19 and the controversies of vaccination during the pandemic. The use of images enhances the understanding of the tex, such as choropleth maps and statistical graphs. It is a solid article all around.