User:Fried913/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Global dimming

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

Global dimming: it is a topic that interests me, and it's a key concept to understanding the difference between short and long term impacts.

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

I believe the lead section was very good, it appeared to have a good amount of history behind it, it could be said that it is slightly over detailed, but it was not over opioniated and had good sources. The rest of the article seemed to be properly cited and had good information. It defiently has a more of an emphasis on future impacts, but that is a viable thing to focus on considering the topic. The article only appears to state factaul evidence and does not make claims not in the bounds of the information provided. Even in the futures section, it is all based off of scientific studies predicting future, not pop articles or fear mongering websites. I think the content is organizedpretty well, some of it slightly reads like an essay, but I still think it is pretty easy to rea for the average person. I belive the the images were a nice complenetary part of the article, giving visualizations to the papers and statistics that we spoken about. There appeared to be conversation based on the wording/phrasing of previous sentances, and some information requested to be removed due to non clarity/or to much bias.

I thought the article was very well written, and good for anyone to read to try to understand more about global dimming/aersols.