User:FroggyLilyPad/Evaluate an Article

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
== (Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)  I chose this article as it was rated C class yet is a highly important concept that especially touches upon the core of our class. This is quite a long article with some of the issues noted in the banner being that it needs additional citations for verification and may be too intricately detailed. ==

Lead Section
== The lead section for this article is succinct and informative with a clear introductory sentence. This section does not include an overview of main sections of the article below but starts introducing the origin of the term and its creators who popularized it. This information is left out of the following "Introduction" section. ==

Content
== The content throughout this article is relevant to the topic. While it discusses many different principles and aspects of design this article does not go into the many named principles that are central to HCI and the Human Factors that are related. On a related note, the Human Factors article does not go into the details of the field at all and is greatly lacking. ==

Images and Media
== There are only two images on the article. The first one is helpful is supporting the concept described. The second image is a small, busy diagram, which makes it hard to read or understand. The article could use more supporting media throughout to better illustrate the concepts. ==

Talk Page Discussion
== This article is part of several wikiprojects including: Computing, Computer Science, Sociology, The Guild of Copy Editors, Computer Security: Computing, and Human--Computer Interaction. There is one section on the current talk page requesting to split Human Computer Integration from this page, but others disagree with the reasoning being offered by the original poster. There are two wikieducation semesters listed as contributors tho this page as well. There are several archived years of talk pages for this article as well as it was being developed. ==

Overall Impressions
== My overall impressions are that this article has been recently fleshed out more but is currently missing a lot of citations to support the various facts throughout. The status is a C-Class article as rated by the content assessment scale. == FroggyLilyPad (talk) 19:06, 5 April 2024 (UTC)