User:FrozenFrosch/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
(Emma Goldman)

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
I decided to pick this article because I know Emma Goldman is an individual who has a decent bit of historical importance. From the Wikiproject I was looking through, this article is well-researched & has a decent bit of evidence put into it. She's also an individual I want to know about more personally, so I thought it was a good thing to look at!

Evaluate the article
Really solid lead section to the article. Within the first 1-2 sentences, I have a very basic understanding of who Emma Goldman is, her place in history, and the type of work she did. Following this, the lead section goes into even more basic information placing her background, some of the key points in/ aspects of her life, and gives even more detail about her importance in history (properly describing her influence in feminist, anti-capitalist and anarchist thought).

Tone and balance throughout the article seem to be very neutral. There aren't many subjective statements that I can see, but instead see a lot of factual statements detailing certain decisions, involvements and actions she took (and why), but without any sort of commentary on the morality or opinion of those decisions.

There are multiple images throughout the article which further add to the topic of the article; I also greatly appreciate the links back to the broader Wikiprojects that the article is linked to.

Everything in the article seems up to date and is relevant to the topic at hand.

(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)