User:Frozenbanana97/Golden-bellied capuchin/The86Juse Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

FrozenBanana97


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:Frozenbanana97/Golden-bellied capuchin


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Golden-bellied capuchin

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

Lead: has not been completed yet

Content: the content itself is framed nicely under headings that adequately describe what is put forth. what is written seems up to date in terms of relevance.

Tone and Balance: the content is presented in a neutral format with a broad overview of several relevant topics pertaining to the wikipedia article

Sources and references: the sources are good secondary peer reviewed articles, that are fairly recent in publication. The links that I checked worked when accessing the reference.

Organization: the headings and subsections breakdown the descriptions of the topic quite nicely, making it easy to read and digest.

Images and media: no images or media was presented by the student.

overall impressions: the content that was added by the student was a good addition to what was already there. the lead will be a nice finishing element once it is updated.