User:FrzIce/Evaluate an Article

Which article are you evaluating?
Music theory - Wikipedia

Why you have chosen this article to evaluate?
(Briefly explain why you chose it, why it matters, and what your preliminary impression of it was.)

I chose Music Theory because I like music and I want to learn how to make music. Music Theory matters because that is the premise of music and songs. my preliminary impression was that it goes into very bit detail about the history and fundamentals

Evaluate the article
(Compose a detailed evaluation of the article here, considering each of the key aspects listed above. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what a useful Wikipedia article evaluation looks like.)

The lead is good because it starts with an basic introduction to the meaning of Music Theory and then goes more into the parts of music theory, however it does not talk about what is upcoming in-depth. The content of this article talks about all parts of music theory including history, fundamentals of music, and uses in todays scenes. This article talks about all every history with music theory including history that's more unknown. The article is natural in nature and represents every history equally, and does not focus on one history more then anything else. Many of the facts are backed up by sources and links to other Wikipedia articles by different users which do work. The article is pretty well organized having history and fundamentals being separated and history being sorted by time. The article uses images and media very well, for example using images to show music notation to describe chords and melody's, all imagery and media adhere to copyright regulations. this article is rated B-class and is within the scope of WikiProject Music Theory, in the talk page users are talking about different theory's and more detailed explanations. This Article is really good for talking about the history and fundamentals, however it could probably go more in depth about what the article is about in the first few paragraphs, and this article feel well-developed.