User:Ftaylor4/Choose an Article

Article Selection
Please list articles that you're considering for your Wikipedia assignment below. Begin to critique these articles and find relevant sources.

Option 1

 * Kidney Disease
 * After briefly reading over the article I agree with the notes about how to improve the article. This article needs to have more medical-related sources. Many of the sources are similar and adding more medical-related sources will improve the quality of the essay. Also, the article relies very heavily on primary sources. The article has to be updated as well. The last update was almost 6 years ago. The author does go into a good job at hitting all of the key factors of the disease and the content is related to the topic without being biased. the only question I have is whether there is a limit to how many citations you can use in one article. The author uses 28 sources and it is hard for me to go through all of them.
 * After briefly reading over the article I agree with the notes about how to improve the article. This article needs to have more medical-related sources. Many of the sources are similar and adding more medical-related sources will improve the quality of the essay. Also, the article relies very heavily on primary sources. The article has to be updated as well. The last update was almost 6 years ago. The author does go into a good job at hitting all of the key factors of the disease and the content is related to the topic without being biased. the only question I have is whether there is a limit to how many citations you can use in one article. The author uses 28 sources and it is hard for me to go through all of them.

Option 2

 * Pediatric nurse practitioner
 * The title could add a better catch to it. The article has a good strong lead. The source was written in 2020 so It is not very old. Overall this article is well written. The article is nonbiased and stays on the facts and the sources used in this article are all health facilities and seem to be reliable.
 * The title could add a better catch to it. The article has a good strong lead. The source was written in 2020 so It is not very old. Overall this article is well written. The article is nonbiased and stays on the facts and the sources used in this article are all health facilities and seem to be reliable.

Option 3

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 4

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources

Option 5

 * Article title
 * Article Evaluation
 * Sources
 * Sources
 * Sources