User:Fuller2019/Tonic water/Bellamila13 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

I am peer editing Fuller2019's article "Tonic Water".


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Fuller2019/Tonic_water?preload=Template%3ADashboard.wikiedu.org_draft_template
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)
 * Tonic water

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead: The lead for this article is strong! It informs the reader but isn't too detailed. I would maybe add another short sentence about how it has other uses as well

Content: All of the content in this piece is relevant, up-to-date, and informational. I didn't know that tonic water had additional purposes/effects besides in drinks, so this was intriguing to read about. One thing I would change is "the sweet concoction made sense". It felt a bit informal, but I like the idea you are trying to incorporate in that sentence. Instead, possibly rephrasing the sentence would work.

Tone and balance: The entirety of this article was from a neutral position. I didn't see any areas of biased perspectives or emotional aspects. The tone was consistent throughout and I don't believe any changes need to be made.

Sources/resources: There are plenty of sources for this article. There are a large range of publication dates, but they all seem relevant and there are quite a few that are recent enough where it is reliable. The links that I checked worked, but I did not check all of them. There are a few spots in the quinine content section where a few more citations would be beneficial, as a lot of specific facts and information is presented.

Organization: The organization was easy to read and follow through for this article. I think this set up is the best way to present the information, and the author did an excellent job with this.

Images: I love the picture. It's really interesting to see the tonic water under UV light, and dedicating a section to addressing this is crucial as well.

Overall, your article is really strong! There are only a few minor suggestions I would recommend, but I think your article is great in general.