User:Fungus Consumer/Sporormiella/MvKino Peer Review

General info
Fungus Consumer
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Fungus Consumer/Sporormiella
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Sporormiella

Evaluate the drafted changes
(Compose a detailed peer review here, considering each of the key aspects listed above if it is relevant. Consider the guiding questions, and check out the examples of what feedback looks like.)

This article looks well updated and seems to have increased in size a lot. Some quick notes that may clean up this draft are...

I believe the first paragraph is two run on sentences, maybe split it into four!

I think it would also be helpful to go through and link uncommon or scientific vocabulary to their wiki pages so that readers can get a quick understanding of what is being referenced.

Second sentence in the taxonomy section could be two sentences.

The end of the first taxonomy paragraph was a little confusing. All the names are kind of jumbled together.

The Life History section felt a little repetitive. I felt as though a lot of the information in that section I had already read. Rewording this section may help it stick out as its own.

Last thing is maybe add a picture or two.

I think this article did a great job of encompassing a lot of information on Sporormiella. The sheer amount of new info added to this page is impressive. The changes stated above are all I can really comment on. I think the most important thing you could do to improve the article is rework the life history section. Some of the sections you added to the draft I didn't think of and will use them as inspiration for my own. This paper met the check list of having a lead section, clear structure, balanced coverage, neutral content, and reliable sources. Nothing was really distracting and everything in the article was relevant. This article does a great job on not taking a side in the classification debate. All the linked sources below look to be reliable and all work. In text citations and references are used well.