User:Fz23/Urocortin III/RCC23A Peer Review

General info
Fz23
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing:User:Fz23/Urocortin III
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):Urocortin III

Evaluate the drafted changes
After reviewing your drafted changes to the Urocortin III Wikipedia article I only have a view notes.

It looks as though you are basically starting from scratch which is good. I think your lead is strong; however, I would reorganize what comes after it immediately. You finish off your lead discussing the structure and affinity of Urocortin III but then lead in the the eveolutionary view of the molecule. Instead I would follow the lead up with "... Affinity to receptors section" and place the " Evolutionary view" section after the "UCN II and Stress", so that the article is a bit more streamlined and flows better.

You use a litany of articles to support the entirety of your article, very good.

The last comment I would make is to just clean up your contributions before adding it to the original "stub" article. Presentation is everything, especially on Wiki, and I would hate for anyone to discredit work based on grammatical or formating miss ques.

In summary, it appears as though you put forth a great deal of effort and knowledge to jumpstart this wikipedia page.