User:G.O Memo/International communication/RR5786 Peer Review

General info
(provide username)
 * Whose work are you reviewing?


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * User:G.O Memo/International communication
 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists):

Evaluate the drafted changes
Lead:

The article does not contain a lead

Content:

All of the content is relevant to the article, the sources are from the 2010s so they are decently up to date.

Tone and Balance:

While overall I would say a good portion of the article is neutral and doesn't try and persuade the reader, some parts like the fourth paragraph could be rephrased to a way that is less biased towards one group or another.

Sources and References:

The sources are up to date and help the content.

Organization:

While the article is mostly well written I would recommend splitting the article into sections if needed.

Images and Media:

No images or media was added with the article.