User:G9m9brown/Theyby/Barb22 Peer Review

General info

 * Whose work are you reviewing?

G9m9brown


 * Link to draft you're reviewing
 * Theyby


 * Link to the current version of the article (if it exists)

Evaluate the drafted changes
Overall, I thought the content has definitely improved the overall quality of the article, making it complete. the content added has strengths in the resources it uses when citing the work as well as providing various viewpoints on the topic. I thought this was very important since this is a hot topic so by providing multiple viewpoints it makes the article very neutral in informing the reader. The organization of the article was also done well, beginning with an interesting hook as well as listing the origins, parenting style, and legal recognition as well as criticisms. I think my only critique would be to possibly dive further in the criticism section with some more detail.